DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna. / Gielings, Romy; Fais, Maria; Fontaneto, Diego et al.
In: Frontiers in Marine Science, 30.09.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Gielings, R, Fais, M, Fontaneto, D, Creer, S, Costa, FO, Renema, W & Macher, J-N 2021, 'DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna', Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

APA

Gielings, R., Fais, M., Fontaneto, D., Creer, S., Costa, F. O., Renema, W., & Macher, J.-N. (2021). DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

CBE

Gielings R, Fais M, Fontaneto D, Creer S, Costa FO, Renema W, Macher J-N. 2021. DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Gielings R, Fais M, Fontaneto D, Creer S, Costa FO, Renema W et al. DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021 Sept 30. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

Author

Gielings, Romy ; Fais, Maria ; Fontaneto, Diego et al. / DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna. In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - DNA Metabarcoding Methods for the Study of Marine Benthic Meiofauna

AU - Gielings, Romy

AU - Fais, Maria

AU - Fontaneto, Diego

AU - Creer, Simon

AU - Costa, Filipe Oliveira

AU - Renema, Willem

AU - Macher, Jan-Niklas

PY - 2021/9/30

Y1 - 2021/9/30

N2 - Meiofaunal animals, roughly between 0.045 and 1 mm in size, are ubiquitous and ecologically important inhabitants of benthic marine ecosystems. Their high species richness and rapid response to environmental change make them promising targets for ecological and biomonitoring studies. However, diversity patterns of benthic marine meiofauna remain poorly known due to challenges in species identification using classical morphological methods. DNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool to overcome this limitation. Here, we review DNA metabarcoding approaches used in studies on marine meiobenthos with the aim of facilitating researchers to make informed decisions for the implementation of DNA metabarcoding in meiofaunal biodiversity monitoring. We found that the applied methods vary greatly between researchers and studies, and concluded that further explicit comparisons of protocols are needed to apply DNA metabarcoding as a standard tool for assessing benthic meiofaunal community composition. Key aspects that require additional consideration include: (1) comparability of sample pre-treatment methods; (2) integration of different primers and molecular markers for both the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear 18S rRNA genes to maximize taxon recovery; (3) precise and standardized description of sampling methods to allow for comparison and replication; and (4) evaluation and testing of bioinformatic pipelines to enhance comparability between studies. By enhancing comparability between the various approaches currently used for the different aspects of the analyses, DNA metabarcoding will improve the long-term integrative potential for surveying and biomonitoring marine benthic meiofauna.

AB - Meiofaunal animals, roughly between 0.045 and 1 mm in size, are ubiquitous and ecologically important inhabitants of benthic marine ecosystems. Their high species richness and rapid response to environmental change make them promising targets for ecological and biomonitoring studies. However, diversity patterns of benthic marine meiofauna remain poorly known due to challenges in species identification using classical morphological methods. DNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool to overcome this limitation. Here, we review DNA metabarcoding approaches used in studies on marine meiobenthos with the aim of facilitating researchers to make informed decisions for the implementation of DNA metabarcoding in meiofaunal biodiversity monitoring. We found that the applied methods vary greatly between researchers and studies, and concluded that further explicit comparisons of protocols are needed to apply DNA metabarcoding as a standard tool for assessing benthic meiofaunal community composition. Key aspects that require additional consideration include: (1) comparability of sample pre-treatment methods; (2) integration of different primers and molecular markers for both the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear 18S rRNA genes to maximize taxon recovery; (3) precise and standardized description of sampling methods to allow for comparison and replication; and (4) evaluation and testing of bioinformatic pipelines to enhance comparability between studies. By enhancing comparability between the various approaches currently used for the different aspects of the analyses, DNA metabarcoding will improve the long-term integrative potential for surveying and biomonitoring marine benthic meiofauna.

U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

DO - 10.3389/fmars.2021.730063

M3 - Article

JO - Frontiers in Marine Science

JF - Frontiers in Marine Science

SN - 2296-7745

ER -