Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis. / Grosskopf, Brit; Pearce, Graeme.
In: Management Science, Vol. 66, No. 11, 11.2020, p. 5059-5074.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Grosskopf B, Pearce G. Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis. Management Science. 2020 Nov;66(11):5059-5074. Epub 2020 May 21. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3483

Author

Grosskopf, Brit ; Pearce, Graeme. / Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis. In: Management Science. 2020 ; Vol. 66, No. 11. pp. 5059-5074.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do You Mind Me Paying Less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis

AU - Grosskopf, Brit

AU - Pearce, Graeme

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - We present a natural field experiment designed to measure other-regarding preferences in the market for taxis. We employed testers of varying ethnicity to take a number of predetermined taxi journeys. In each case, we endowed them with only 80% of the expected fare. Testers revealed the amount they could afford to pay to the driver midjourney and asked for a portion of the journey for free. In a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we vary the length of the journey and whether a business card is elicited. We find that (1) the majority of drivers give at least part of the journey for free, (2) giving is proportional to the length of the journey, and (3) 27% of drivers complete the journey. Evidence of outgroup negativity against black testers is also reported. In order to link our empirical analysis to behavioral theory, we estimate the parameters of a number of utility functions. The data and the structural analysis lend support to the quantitative predictions of experiments that measure other-regarding preferences, and they shed further light on how discrimination can manifest itself within our preferences.

AB - We present a natural field experiment designed to measure other-regarding preferences in the market for taxis. We employed testers of varying ethnicity to take a number of predetermined taxi journeys. In each case, we endowed them with only 80% of the expected fare. Testers revealed the amount they could afford to pay to the driver midjourney and asked for a portion of the journey for free. In a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we vary the length of the journey and whether a business card is elicited. We find that (1) the majority of drivers give at least part of the journey for free, (2) giving is proportional to the length of the journey, and (3) 27% of drivers complete the journey. Evidence of outgroup negativity against black testers is also reported. In order to link our empirical analysis to behavioral theory, we estimate the parameters of a number of utility functions. The data and the structural analysis lend support to the quantitative predictions of experiments that measure other-regarding preferences, and they shed further light on how discrimination can manifest itself within our preferences.

KW - other-regarding preferences

KW - field experiment

KW - discrimination

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3483

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3483

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 5059

EP - 5074

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 11

ER -