Does an overdraft facility influence the customer costs of using a personal current account?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 1-26.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does an overdraft facility influence the customer costs of using a personal current account?
AU - Ashton, John
AU - Gregoriou, Andros
N1 - 2016 Taylor & Francis. This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - This study examines if personal current accounts offering an overdraft facility costs customers’ less to use than accounts not offering this service. This analysis uses a UK data set of 222 personal current accounts, recorded monthly between 1995 and 2011 in combination with interest rates from 1,200 instant access deposit accounts offered contemporaneously by the same firms. Our results indicate personal current accounts offering overdraft facilities have higher deposit and payment service costs than accounts not offering this service; a finding robust to varying service attributes. This result is inconsistent with suggestions that overdraft users have been cross-subsidising other personal current account users as widely reported in theoretical and policy literatures. It is concluded that implicit and inertia costs of personal current account use may be more influential than previously reported in the pricing of these accounts.
AB - This study examines if personal current accounts offering an overdraft facility costs customers’ less to use than accounts not offering this service. This analysis uses a UK data set of 222 personal current accounts, recorded monthly between 1995 and 2011 in combination with interest rates from 1,200 instant access deposit accounts offered contemporaneously by the same firms. Our results indicate personal current accounts offering overdraft facilities have higher deposit and payment service costs than accounts not offering this service; a finding robust to varying service attributes. This result is inconsistent with suggestions that overdraft users have been cross-subsidising other personal current account users as widely reported in theoretical and policy literatures. It is concluded that implicit and inertia costs of personal current account use may be more influential than previously reported in the pricing of these accounts.
KW - Checking Accounts
KW - Personal current accounts
KW - Contingent charges
KW - Implicit costs
KW - Interest reate setting
KW - Overdrafts
U2 - 10.1080/13571516.2016.1222990
DO - 10.1080/13571516.2016.1222990
M3 - Article
VL - 24
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - International Journal of the Economics of Business
JF - International Journal of the Economics of Business
SN - 1357-1516
IS - 1
ER -