Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference? / Roberts, James W; Lawrence, Gavin P; Welsh, Timothy N et al.
In: Human Movement Science, Vol. 76, 102773, 04.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Roberts, JW, Lawrence, GP, Welsh, TN & Wilson, MR 2021, 'Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?', Human Movement Science, vol. 76, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

APA

Roberts, J. W., Lawrence, G. P., Welsh, T. N., & Wilson, M. R. (2021). Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference? Human Movement Science, 76, Article 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

CBE

Roberts JW, Lawrence GP, Welsh TN, Wilson MR. 2021. Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?. Human Movement Science. 76:Article 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Roberts JW, Lawrence GP, Welsh TN, Wilson MR. Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference? Human Movement Science. 2021 Apr;76:102773. Epub 2021 Feb 23. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

Author

Roberts, James W ; Lawrence, Gavin P ; Welsh, Timothy N et al. / Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?. In: Human Movement Science. 2021 ; Vol. 76.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does high state anxiety exacerbate distractor interference?

AU - Roberts, James W

AU - Lawrence, Gavin P

AU - Welsh, Timothy N

AU - Wilson, Mark R

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - Attentional Control Theory states that anxiety can cause attention to be allocated to irrelevant sources of information by hindering the ability to control attention and focus on the information that matters. In a separate line of inquiry, action-centred views of attention state that non-target distractors involuntarily activate response codes that may cause interference with target-directed movements (distractor interference effect). Due to the proposed negative effects of anxiety on attentional control, we examined whether anxiety could also modulate distractor interference. Participants executed target-directed aiming movements to one of three targets with the potential of a distractor being presented at near or far locations. Distractors were presented at different times with respect to the target presentation in order to explore the excitatory (0, -100 ms) and inhibitory (-850 ms) processing of the distractor. As a broad indication of the effect of anxiety, the analysis of no distractor trials indicated a lower proportion of time and displacement to reach peak velocity under high compared to low anxiety conditions. Meanwhile, the typical excitatory influence of the distractors located near, compared to far, at a short distractor-onset asynchrony was found in movement time and overall response time. However, this distractor excitation was even greater under high compared to low anxiety in the reaction time component of the response. These findings broadly implicate the attentional control perspective, but they further indicate an influence of anxiety on the excitation rather than inhibition of responses.

AB - Attentional Control Theory states that anxiety can cause attention to be allocated to irrelevant sources of information by hindering the ability to control attention and focus on the information that matters. In a separate line of inquiry, action-centred views of attention state that non-target distractors involuntarily activate response codes that may cause interference with target-directed movements (distractor interference effect). Due to the proposed negative effects of anxiety on attentional control, we examined whether anxiety could also modulate distractor interference. Participants executed target-directed aiming movements to one of three targets with the potential of a distractor being presented at near or far locations. Distractors were presented at different times with respect to the target presentation in order to explore the excitatory (0, -100 ms) and inhibitory (-850 ms) processing of the distractor. As a broad indication of the effect of anxiety, the analysis of no distractor trials indicated a lower proportion of time and displacement to reach peak velocity under high compared to low anxiety conditions. Meanwhile, the typical excitatory influence of the distractors located near, compared to far, at a short distractor-onset asynchrony was found in movement time and overall response time. However, this distractor excitation was even greater under high compared to low anxiety in the reaction time component of the response. These findings broadly implicate the attentional control perspective, but they further indicate an influence of anxiety on the excitation rather than inhibition of responses.

U2 - 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

DO - 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102773

M3 - Article

C2 - 33636571

VL - 76

JO - Human Movement Science

JF - Human Movement Science

SN - 0167-9457

M1 - 102773

ER -