Does the board of directors and (non)-executives’ ownership mitigate interest payment classification shifting? UK Evidence
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19.01.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does the board of directors and (non)-executives’ ownership mitigate interest payment classification shifting? UK Evidence
AU - Hessian, Mohamed
AU - Zalata, Alaa
AU - Hussainey, Khaled
PY - 2024/1/19
Y1 - 2024/1/19
N2 - We investigate whether the board of directors and stock ownership by outside directors and executives may limit interest payment classification shifting within the statement of cash flows. We find that the interest payment classification shifting is less prevalent in UK firms with high-quality internal governance, demonstrating that effective internal governance may serve as a substitute for rules-based accounting standards. While we find governance mechanisms play a crucial role in mitigating such practice in both distressed and non-distressed firms, our finding is more pronounced in non-distressed firms. We also find that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the board independence, managerial and independent directors’ stock ownership, and the classification shifting of interest payment; indeed, it is premature to propose that independent and stock ownership can serve as an effective mechanism in mitigating managerial opportunism in all cases, and indeed, there should be optimal independent director and ownership thresholds before which caution would be required to ensure that managers remain focused on maximizing shareholder value.
AB - We investigate whether the board of directors and stock ownership by outside directors and executives may limit interest payment classification shifting within the statement of cash flows. We find that the interest payment classification shifting is less prevalent in UK firms with high-quality internal governance, demonstrating that effective internal governance may serve as a substitute for rules-based accounting standards. While we find governance mechanisms play a crucial role in mitigating such practice in both distressed and non-distressed firms, our finding is more pronounced in non-distressed firms. We also find that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the board independence, managerial and independent directors’ stock ownership, and the classification shifting of interest payment; indeed, it is premature to propose that independent and stock ownership can serve as an effective mechanism in mitigating managerial opportunism in all cases, and indeed, there should be optimal independent director and ownership thresholds before which caution would be required to ensure that managers remain focused on maximizing shareholder value.
M3 - Article
JO - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
JF - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
SN - 1061-9518
ER -