EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion. / Mottola, Francesca; Blanchfield, Anthony; Hardy, James et al.
In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 55, 101944, 07.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Mottola, Francesca et al. "EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021. 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101944

VancouverVancouver

Mottola F, Blanchfield A, Hardy J, Cooke A. EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021 Jul;55:101944. Epub 2021 Apr 7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101944

Author

Mottola, Francesca ; Blanchfield, Anthony ; Hardy, James et al. / EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion. In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021 ; Vol. 55.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - EEG Neurofeedback Improves Cycling Time to Exhaustion

AU - Mottola, Francesca

AU - Blanchfield, Anthony

AU - Hardy, James

AU - Cooke, Andrew

N1 - 18 months embargo

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - ObjectiveThe role of the brain in endurance performance is frequently debated; surprisingly, few investigations have attempted to improve endurance performance by directly targeting brain activity. One promising but untested approach to modifying brain activity is electroencephalogram (EEG) neurofeedback. Consequently, our experiment is the first to examine an EEG neurofeedback intervention for whole-body endurance performance.MethodWe adopted a two-part experiment. The first consisted of a randomized parallel controlled design. Forty participants were allocated to three experimental groups; increase relative left cortical activity (NFL), increase relative right (NFR), and passive control (CON). They performed a depleting cognitive task, followed by either six 2-min blocks of EEG neurofeedback training (NFL or NFR) or time-matched videos of the neurofeedback display (CON). Next, they performed a time-to-exhaustion (TTE) test on a cycle-ergometer. We then tested participants of NFL and NFR groups in an additional experimental visit and administered the opposite neurofeedback training within a fully repeated-measures protocol.ResultsEEG neurofeedback modified brain activity as expected. As hypothesized, the NFL group cycled for over 30% longer than the other groups in the parallel controlled design, NFL: 1382 ± 252 s, NFR: 878 ± 167, CON: 963 ± 117 s. We replicated this result in the repeated-measures design where NFL: 1167 ± 831 s performed 11% longer than NFR: 1049 ± 638 s). There were no differences in pre-exercise fatigue, vigor or self-control; area under the curve group-differences for perceived effort were interpreted within a goal persistence framework.ConclusionThe brief EEG neurofeedback intervention elicited greater relative left frontal cortical activity and enhanced endurance exercise performance.

AB - ObjectiveThe role of the brain in endurance performance is frequently debated; surprisingly, few investigations have attempted to improve endurance performance by directly targeting brain activity. One promising but untested approach to modifying brain activity is electroencephalogram (EEG) neurofeedback. Consequently, our experiment is the first to examine an EEG neurofeedback intervention for whole-body endurance performance.MethodWe adopted a two-part experiment. The first consisted of a randomized parallel controlled design. Forty participants were allocated to three experimental groups; increase relative left cortical activity (NFL), increase relative right (NFR), and passive control (CON). They performed a depleting cognitive task, followed by either six 2-min blocks of EEG neurofeedback training (NFL or NFR) or time-matched videos of the neurofeedback display (CON). Next, they performed a time-to-exhaustion (TTE) test on a cycle-ergometer. We then tested participants of NFL and NFR groups in an additional experimental visit and administered the opposite neurofeedback training within a fully repeated-measures protocol.ResultsEEG neurofeedback modified brain activity as expected. As hypothesized, the NFL group cycled for over 30% longer than the other groups in the parallel controlled design, NFL: 1382 ± 252 s, NFR: 878 ± 167, CON: 963 ± 117 s. We replicated this result in the repeated-measures design where NFL: 1167 ± 831 s performed 11% longer than NFR: 1049 ± 638 s). There were no differences in pre-exercise fatigue, vigor or self-control; area under the curve group-differences for perceived effort were interpreted within a goal persistence framework.ConclusionThe brief EEG neurofeedback intervention elicited greater relative left frontal cortical activity and enhanced endurance exercise performance.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101944

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101944

M3 - Article

VL - 55

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

M1 - 101944

ER -