Engaging Communities in Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research , Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 61-96.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Engaging Communities in Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis
AU - Novak, Julie
AU - Day, Ashleigh
AU - Sopory, Pradeep
AU - Wilkins, Lee
AU - Padgett, Donyale
AU - Eckert, Stine
AU - Noyes, Jane
AU - Allen, Tomas
AU - Alexander, Nyka
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned systematic reviews to assist with the development of new emergency risk communication guidelines that will impact responses and distribution of resources at all levels. This mixed-method evidence synthesis, guided by Cochrane principles and methods, examined the extant research in countries throughout the world, published from 2003 to 2016, related to the best practices to engage communities in preparing forand responding to emergency events with public health implications. Although few studies directly examined which strategies or tactics effectively engage public participation, many studies reinforced the importance of community participation. The findings support the perspective that emergency events are communicatively understood by all publics and that they benefit fromemergency risk communication before, during, and after such events, especially when grounded in local contexts. Although the importance of local context limits the generalizability of risk communication, it is important to continue studying strategies and tactics to cultivate participation among all stakeholders.
AB - The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned systematic reviews to assist with the development of new emergency risk communication guidelines that will impact responses and distribution of resources at all levels. This mixed-method evidence synthesis, guided by Cochrane principles and methods, examined the extant research in countries throughout the world, published from 2003 to 2016, related to the best practices to engage communities in preparing forand responding to emergency events with public health implications. Although few studies directly examined which strategies or tactics effectively engage public participation, many studies reinforced the importance of community participation. The findings support the perspective that emergency events are communicatively understood by all publics and that they benefit fromemergency risk communication before, during, and after such events, especially when grounded in local contexts. Although the importance of local context limits the generalizability of risk communication, it is important to continue studying strategies and tactics to cultivate participation among all stakeholders.
M3 - Review article
VL - 2
SP - 61
EP - 96
JO - Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
JF - Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
SN - 2576-0025
IS - 1
ER -