Environmental impacts of agricultural plastic film mulch: Fate, consequences, and solutions

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Standard Standard

Environmental impacts of agricultural plastic film mulch: Fate, consequences, and solutions. / Ding, Fan; Jones, Davey L.; Chadwick, David R. et al.
In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 836, 25.08.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Ding F, Jones DL, Chadwick DR, Kim PJ, Jiang R, Flury M. Environmental impacts of agricultural plastic film mulch: Fate, consequences, and solutions. Science of the Total Environment. 2022 Aug 25;836. Epub 2022 May 1. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155668

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental impacts of agricultural plastic film mulch: Fate, consequences, and solutions

AU - Ding, Fan

AU - Jones, Davey L.

AU - Chadwick, David R.

AU - Kim, Pil Joo

AU - Jiang, Rui

AU - Flury, Markus

PY - 2022/8/25

Y1 - 2022/8/25

N2 - Plastic mulch films were first trialed at agricultural research stations in the late 1950s and subsequently adopted commercially for vegetable production in the early 1960s (Kasirajan and Ngouajio, 2012). They are now used extensively within a range of arable and horticultural cropping settings throughout the world. Plastic film mulching (PFM) was originally designed for soil water conservation and raising soil temperatures and has proved indispensable for maintaining agricultural production in many water-deficient or cold regions. For example, in the Loess Plateau of China (Fig. 1), where the climate is cool and semi-arid and the soil is loose and erosive, PFM is the basis for the sustainable development of the dryland farming system (Li et al., 2020a). PFM also offers additional benefits, including reduced weed and pest pressure, enhanced fertilizer use efficiency, shortened ripening times, and improved crop and vegetable quantity and quality.

AB - Plastic mulch films were first trialed at agricultural research stations in the late 1950s and subsequently adopted commercially for vegetable production in the early 1960s (Kasirajan and Ngouajio, 2012). They are now used extensively within a range of arable and horticultural cropping settings throughout the world. Plastic film mulching (PFM) was originally designed for soil water conservation and raising soil temperatures and has proved indispensable for maintaining agricultural production in many water-deficient or cold regions. For example, in the Loess Plateau of China (Fig. 1), where the climate is cool and semi-arid and the soil is loose and erosive, PFM is the basis for the sustainable development of the dryland farming system (Li et al., 2020a). PFM also offers additional benefits, including reduced weed and pest pressure, enhanced fertilizer use efficiency, shortened ripening times, and improved crop and vegetable quantity and quality.

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155668

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155668

M3 - Editorial

VL - 836

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -