Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Land, Vol. 10, No. 4, 430, 17.04.2021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum
AU - Welivita, Indunee
AU - Willcock, Simon
AU - Lewis, Amy
AU - Bundhoo, Dilshaad
AU - Brewer, Tim
AU - Cooper, Sarah
AU - Lynch, Kenneth
AU - Mekala, Sneha
AU - Mishra, Prajna Paramita
AU - Venkatesh, Kongala
AU - Rey Vicario, Dolores
AU - Hutchings, Paul
PY - 2021/4/17
Y1 - 2021/4/17
N2 - In 2006 the world’s population passed the threshold of being equally split between rural and urban areas. Since this point, urbanisation has continued and the majority of the global population are now urban inhabitants. With this ongoing change, it is likely that the way people receive benefits from nature (ecosystem services; ES) has also evolved. Environmental theory suggests that rural residents depend directly on their local environment (conceptualised as green-loop systems), whereas urban residents have relatively indirect relationships with distant ecosystems (conceptualised as red-loop systems). Here, we evaluate this theory using survey data from >3,000 households in and around Hyderabad, India. Controlling for other confounding socioeconomic variables, we investigate how flows of 10 ES vary across rural, peri-urban and urban areas. For most of the ES we investigated, we find no statistical differences in the levels of direct or indirect use of an ecosystem, the distance to the ecosystem, nor the quantities of ES used between rural and urban residents (P>0.05). However, our results do show that urban people themselves often travel shorter distances than rural people to access most ES, likely because improved infrastructure in urban areas allows the transport of ES from wider ecosystems to the locality of the beneficiaries’ place of residence. Thus, while we find some evidence to support red-loop, green-loop theory, we conclude that ES flows across the rural-urban spectrum may show more similarities than might be expected. As such, the impact of future urbanisation on ES flows may be limited, because many flows in both rural and urban areas have already undergone globalisation.
AB - In 2006 the world’s population passed the threshold of being equally split between rural and urban areas. Since this point, urbanisation has continued and the majority of the global population are now urban inhabitants. With this ongoing change, it is likely that the way people receive benefits from nature (ecosystem services; ES) has also evolved. Environmental theory suggests that rural residents depend directly on their local environment (conceptualised as green-loop systems), whereas urban residents have relatively indirect relationships with distant ecosystems (conceptualised as red-loop systems). Here, we evaluate this theory using survey data from >3,000 households in and around Hyderabad, India. Controlling for other confounding socioeconomic variables, we investigate how flows of 10 ES vary across rural, peri-urban and urban areas. For most of the ES we investigated, we find no statistical differences in the levels of direct or indirect use of an ecosystem, the distance to the ecosystem, nor the quantities of ES used between rural and urban residents (P>0.05). However, our results do show that urban people themselves often travel shorter distances than rural people to access most ES, likely because improved infrastructure in urban areas allows the transport of ES from wider ecosystems to the locality of the beneficiaries’ place of residence. Thus, while we find some evidence to support red-loop, green-loop theory, we conclude that ES flows across the rural-urban spectrum may show more similarities than might be expected. As such, the impact of future urbanisation on ES flows may be limited, because many flows in both rural and urban areas have already undergone globalisation.
KW - India
KW - cultural
KW - green-loop
KW - nature's contributions to people
KW - peri-urban
KW - provisioning
KW - red-loop
KW - regulating
KW - urbanisation
U2 - 10.3390/land10040430
DO - 10.3390/land10040430
M3 - Article
VL - 10
JO - Land
JF - Land
SN - 2073-445X
IS - 4
M1 - 430
ER -