Expectation Violation Leads to Generalization: The Effect of Prediction Error on the Acquisition of New Syntactic Structures
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
Standard Standard
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science SocietyVolume. Vol. 43 2021. p. 875-881.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Expectation Violation Leads to Generalization: The Effect of Prediction Error on the Acquisition of New Syntactic Structures
AU - Bovolenta, Giulia
AU - Marsden, Emma
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Prediction error is known to enhance priming effects for familiar syntactic structures; it also strengthens the formation of new declarative memories. Here, we investigate whether violating expectations may aid the acquisition of new abstract syntactic structures, too, by enhancing memory for individual instances which can then form the basis for abstraction. In a cross-situational artificial language learning paradigm, participants were exposed to novel syntactic structures in ways that either violated their expectations (Surprisal group) or that conformed to them (Control group). Results from a delayed post-test show that participants in the Surprisal group developed stronger representations of the structures’ form-meaning mappings and were better able to generalize them to new instances, relative to the Control group.
AB - Prediction error is known to enhance priming effects for familiar syntactic structures; it also strengthens the formation of new declarative memories. Here, we investigate whether violating expectations may aid the acquisition of new abstract syntactic structures, too, by enhancing memory for individual instances which can then form the basis for abstraction. In a cross-situational artificial language learning paradigm, participants were exposed to novel syntactic structures in ways that either violated their expectations (Surprisal group) or that conformed to them (Control group). Results from a delayed post-test show that participants in the Surprisal group developed stronger representations of the structures’ form-meaning mappings and were better able to generalize them to new instances, relative to the Control group.
M3 - Conference contribution
VL - 43
SP - 875
EP - 881
BT - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science SocietyVolume
ER -