Exploring complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Standard Standard
Complex Interventions in Health: An overview of research methods. ed. / David Richards; Ingalill Rahm Hallberg. 1st . ed. Routledge, 2015. p. 73-80.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Exploring complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions
AU - Koepke, Sascha
AU - Noyes, Jane
AU - Chandler, Jackie
AU - Meyer, Gabriele
PY - 2015/4/22
Y1 - 2015/4/22
N2 - The development of a complex intervention inevitably requires the preparation of a systematic review of the existing evidence in order to inform all steps of the development and evaluation processes. Beyond the general methodological challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, systematic reviews of complex interventions pose specific challenges. In particular, the reporting of primary studies of complex interventions is often not sufficient to produce meaningful summaries of the research evidence (Guise et al., 2014). As a consequence, systematic reviews of complex interventions regularly provide insufficient information. Frequently, randomized controlled trials of complex interventions that have been developed and evaluated carefully through different development phases are combined with trials of insufficiently developed interventions. Studies evaluating the efficacy of an intervention for the first time are often combined with studies that transfer a programme to another context. In view of these difficulties, this chapter addresses a number of challenges encountered when preparing systematic reviews of complex interventions.
AB - The development of a complex intervention inevitably requires the preparation of a systematic review of the existing evidence in order to inform all steps of the development and evaluation processes. Beyond the general methodological challenges of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, systematic reviews of complex interventions pose specific challenges. In particular, the reporting of primary studies of complex interventions is often not sufficient to produce meaningful summaries of the research evidence (Guise et al., 2014). As a consequence, systematic reviews of complex interventions regularly provide insufficient information. Frequently, randomized controlled trials of complex interventions that have been developed and evaluated carefully through different development phases are combined with trials of insufficiently developed interventions. Studies evaluating the efficacy of an intervention for the first time are often combined with studies that transfer a programme to another context. In view of these difficulties, this chapter addresses a number of challenges encountered when preparing systematic reviews of complex interventions.
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978-0415703161
SP - 73
EP - 80
BT - Complex Interventions in Health
A2 - Richards, David
A2 - Rahm Hallberg, Ingalill
PB - Routledge
ER -