Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour. / Hortensius, Ruud; Kent, Michaela; Darda, Kohinoor et al.
In: Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 42, No. 13, 09.2021, p. 4224-4241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Hortensius, R, Kent, M, Darda, K, Jastrzab, L, Koldewyn, K, Ramsey, R & Cross, ES 2021, 'Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour', Human Brain Mapping, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 4224-4241. https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.25542

APA

Hortensius, R., Kent, M., Darda, K., Jastrzab, L., Koldewyn, K., Ramsey, R., & Cross, E. S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour. Human Brain Mapping, 42(13), 4224-4241. https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.25542

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Hortensius R, Kent M, Darda K, Jastrzab L, Koldewyn K, Ramsey R et al. Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour. Human Brain Mapping. 2021 Sept;42(13):4224-4241. Epub 2021 Jul 1. doi: /10.1002/hbm.25542

Author

Hortensius, Ruud ; Kent, Michaela ; Darda, Kohinoor et al. / Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour. In: Human Brain Mapping. 2021 ; Vol. 42, No. 13. pp. 4224-4241.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind in brain and behaviour

AU - Hortensius, Ruud

AU - Kent, Michaela

AU - Darda, Kohinoor

AU - Jastrzab, Laura

AU - Koldewyn, Kami

AU - Ramsey, Richard

AU - Cross, Emily S.

N1 - Fundação Bial; H2020 European Research Council, Grant/Award Numbers: 677270, 716974; Leverhulme Trust, Grant/Award Number: PLP-2018-152

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - The process of understanding the minds of other people, such as their emotions and intentions, is mimicked when individuals try to understand an artificial mind. The assumption is that anthropomorphism, attributing human-like characteristics to non-human agents and objects, is an analogue to theory-of-mind, the ability to infer mental states of other people. Here, we test to what extent these two constructs formally overlap. Specifically, using a multi-method approach, we test if and how anthropomorphism is related to theory-of-mind using brain (Experiment 1) and behavioural (Experiment 2) measures. In a first exploratory experiment, we examine the relationship between dispositional anthropomorphism and activity within the theory-of-mind brain network (n = 108). Results from a Bayesian regression analysis showed no consistent relationship between dispositional anthropomorphism and activity in regions of the theory-of-mind network. In a follow-up, pre-registered experiment, we explored the relationship between theory-of-mind and situational and dispositional anthropomorphism in more depth. Participants (n = 311) watched a short movie while simultaneously completing situational anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind ratings, as well as measures of dispositional anthropomorphism and general theory-of-mind. Only situational anthropomorphism predicted the ability to understand and predict the behaviour of the film's characters. No relationship between situational or dispositional anthropomorphism and general theory-of-mind was observed. Together, these results suggest that while the constructs of anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind might overlap in certain situations, they remain separate and possibly unrelated at the personality level. These findings point to a possible dissociation between brain and behavioural measures when considering the relationship between theory-of-mind and anthropomorphism.

AB - The process of understanding the minds of other people, such as their emotions and intentions, is mimicked when individuals try to understand an artificial mind. The assumption is that anthropomorphism, attributing human-like characteristics to non-human agents and objects, is an analogue to theory-of-mind, the ability to infer mental states of other people. Here, we test to what extent these two constructs formally overlap. Specifically, using a multi-method approach, we test if and how anthropomorphism is related to theory-of-mind using brain (Experiment 1) and behavioural (Experiment 2) measures. In a first exploratory experiment, we examine the relationship between dispositional anthropomorphism and activity within the theory-of-mind brain network (n = 108). Results from a Bayesian regression analysis showed no consistent relationship between dispositional anthropomorphism and activity in regions of the theory-of-mind network. In a follow-up, pre-registered experiment, we explored the relationship between theory-of-mind and situational and dispositional anthropomorphism in more depth. Participants (n = 311) watched a short movie while simultaneously completing situational anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind ratings, as well as measures of dispositional anthropomorphism and general theory-of-mind. Only situational anthropomorphism predicted the ability to understand and predict the behaviour of the film's characters. No relationship between situational or dispositional anthropomorphism and general theory-of-mind was observed. Together, these results suggest that while the constructs of anthropomorphism and theory-of-mind might overlap in certain situations, they remain separate and possibly unrelated at the personality level. These findings point to a possible dissociation between brain and behavioural measures when considering the relationship between theory-of-mind and anthropomorphism.

KW - anthropomorphism

KW - mind perception

KW - social cognition

KW - theory-of-mind

U2 - /10.1002/hbm.25542

DO - /10.1002/hbm.25542

M3 - Article

C2 - 34196439

VL - 42

SP - 4224

EP - 4241

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1097-0193

IS - 13

ER -