Fathers’ roles matter too: an ethnographic study examining fathers’ roles and the influences on their roles during labour and birth
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
DOI
Background: The introduction examined the cultural and social influences and the outcomes of fathers’ involvement during labour and birth. A review of the literature on fathers’ involvement during labour and birth found that two themes were identified: the roles adopted by fathers, and the barriers and facilitators to their involvement during labour and birth.
Aims of the research study: The aim of this study was to understand fathers’ roles and discover the influences on these roles during labour and birth.
Methodology and methods: The study adopted an ethnographic approach. Fathers accompanying a woman during labour were recruited via the labour ward and midwifery-led unit of one hospital. Data were collected using non-participant observation and in-depth interviews. A staged approach to ethnographic analysis was used, and the patterns of thought and action repeated in various situations, with different participants, were explored.
Results: While fathers appeared to adopt a variety of roles, their overarching role was ‘protecting’ the woman. Fathers adopted different roles in order to achieve their goal of protecting. While couples had expectations of fathers’ roles, they did not always discuss them prior to labour and birth. A number of influences on fathers’ roles were identified which appeared to change their roles or how they were enacted.
Discussion: This study has found that fathers adopted a number of roles during labour and birth; however, these roles were not static and fixed, but were dynamic and changed in response to the changing context of the labour room during the course of labour.
Conclusion: A number of recommendations for practice, research and policy have been outlined, which could contribute to encouraging fathers’ role adoption during labour and birth. This study found that midwives were a significant influence on fathers’ roles and how they were enacted. In practice, this study has the potential to initiate discussions on strategies that can be used by midwives to enhance fathers’ roles during labour and birth.
Aims of the research study: The aim of this study was to understand fathers’ roles and discover the influences on these roles during labour and birth.
Methodology and methods: The study adopted an ethnographic approach. Fathers accompanying a woman during labour were recruited via the labour ward and midwifery-led unit of one hospital. Data were collected using non-participant observation and in-depth interviews. A staged approach to ethnographic analysis was used, and the patterns of thought and action repeated in various situations, with different participants, were explored.
Results: While fathers appeared to adopt a variety of roles, their overarching role was ‘protecting’ the woman. Fathers adopted different roles in order to achieve their goal of protecting. While couples had expectations of fathers’ roles, they did not always discuss them prior to labour and birth. A number of influences on fathers’ roles were identified which appeared to change their roles or how they were enacted.
Discussion: This study has found that fathers adopted a number of roles during labour and birth; however, these roles were not static and fixed, but were dynamic and changed in response to the changing context of the labour room during the course of labour.
Conclusion: A number of recommendations for practice, research and policy have been outlined, which could contribute to encouraging fathers’ role adoption during labour and birth. This study found that midwives were a significant influence on fathers’ roles and how they were enacted. In practice, this study has the potential to initiate discussions on strategies that can be used by midwives to enhance fathers’ roles during labour and birth.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102857 |
Journal | Midwifery |
Volume | 92 |
Early online date | 14 Oct 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |