Good things better? Reappraisal and discrete emotions in Acquired Brain Injury
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 30, No. 10, 25.11.2020, p. 1947-1975 .
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Good things better? Reappraisal and discrete emotions in Acquired Brain Injury
AU - Rowlands, Leanne
AU - Coetzer, Bernardus
AU - Turnbull, Oliver
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation on 04.06.2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09602011.2019.1620788
PY - 2020/11/25
Y1 - 2020/11/25
N2 - There has been substantial interest in emotion after acquired brain injury (ABI), but less attention paid to emotion regulation (ER). Research has focused primarily on the ER strategy of reappraisal for regulating negative emotions, without distinguishing between classes of emotion, and there has been no attempt at exploring these differences in patients with ABI. The present study explored components of reappraisal, across classes of emotion, and their associated neuropsychological mechanisms. Thirty-five patients with ABI and twenty-two matched healthy control participants (HCs) completed two questionnaires, a battery of cognitive tasks, and an emotion regulation task (the Affective Story Recall Reappraisal task). Results suggest that those with ABI take longer, and generate fewer reappraisals than HCs across several discrete emotions. Notably, their ability to decrease emotional intensity did not differ significantly to HCs for negative emotions, but findings suggest that their reappraisals are less effective when up-regulating neutral emotions to positive. Working memory was the only significant predictor of the total number of reappraisals generated, and the time taken to produce a first reappraisal. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of neuropsychological rehabilitation, including the role of the relatives in implementing and reinforcing micro-interventions.
AB - There has been substantial interest in emotion after acquired brain injury (ABI), but less attention paid to emotion regulation (ER). Research has focused primarily on the ER strategy of reappraisal for regulating negative emotions, without distinguishing between classes of emotion, and there has been no attempt at exploring these differences in patients with ABI. The present study explored components of reappraisal, across classes of emotion, and their associated neuropsychological mechanisms. Thirty-five patients with ABI and twenty-two matched healthy control participants (HCs) completed two questionnaires, a battery of cognitive tasks, and an emotion regulation task (the Affective Story Recall Reappraisal task). Results suggest that those with ABI take longer, and generate fewer reappraisals than HCs across several discrete emotions. Notably, their ability to decrease emotional intensity did not differ significantly to HCs for negative emotions, but findings suggest that their reappraisals are less effective when up-regulating neutral emotions to positive. Working memory was the only significant predictor of the total number of reappraisals generated, and the time taken to produce a first reappraisal. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of neuropsychological rehabilitation, including the role of the relatives in implementing and reinforcing micro-interventions.
KW - Emotion regulation
KW - acquired brain injury
KW - cognitive control
KW - discrete emotions
KW - reappraisal
U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2019.1620788
DO - 10.1080/09602011.2019.1620788
M3 - Article
VL - 30
SP - 1947
EP - 1975
JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
SN - 0960-2011
IS - 10
ER -