Standard Standard

Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population. / Gill, Geoffrey V; Ismail, Aziz A; Beeching, Nicholas J et al.
In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 96, No. 7, 07.2003, p. 328-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Gill, GV, Ismail, AA, Beeching, NJ, Macfarlane, SBJ & Bellis, MA 2003, 'Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population', Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 328-32.

APA

Gill, G. V., Ismail, A. A., Beeching, N. J., Macfarlane, S. B. J., & Bellis, M. A. (2003). Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(7), 328-32.

CBE

Gill GV, Ismail AA, Beeching NJ, Macfarlane SBJ, Bellis MA. 2003. Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 96(7):328-32.

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Gill GV, Ismail AA, Beeching NJ, Macfarlane SBJ, Bellis MA. Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003 Jul;96(7):328-32.

Author

Gill, Geoffrey V ; Ismail, Aziz A ; Beeching, Nicholas J et al. / Hidden diabetes in the UK : use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population. In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 96, No. 7. pp. 328-32.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hidden diabetes in the UK

T2 - use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population

AU - Gill, Geoffrey V

AU - Ismail, Aziz A

AU - Beeching, Nicholas J

AU - Macfarlane, Sarah B J

AU - Bellis, Mark A

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - An early requirement of the UK's Diabetes National Service Framework is enumeration of the total affected population. Existing estimates tend to be based on incomplete lists. In a study conducted over one year in North Liverpool, we compared crude prevalence rates for type 1 and type 2 diabetes with estimates obtained by capture-recapture (CR) analysis of multiple incomplete patient lists, to assess the extent of unascertained but diagnosed cases. Patient databases were constructed from six sources-a hospital diabetes centre; general practitioner registers; hospital admissions with a diagnosis of diabetes; a hospital diabetic retinal clinic; a research list of patients with diabetes admitted with stroke; and a local children's hospital. Log linear modelling was used to estimate missing cases, hence total prevalence. The crude prevalence of diabetes was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 1.52), compared with a CR-adjusted rate of 3.1% (CI 3.03, 3.19). Age-banded CR-adjusted prevalence was always higher in males than in females and the difference became more pronounced with increasing age. Among males, CR-adjusted prevalence rose from 0.4% at age 10-19 years to 18.3% at 80+ years; in females the corresponding figures were 0.4% and 9.3%. The gap between crude and CR-estimated prevalence points to a rate of 'hidden diabetes' that has substantial implications for future diabetes care.

AB - An early requirement of the UK's Diabetes National Service Framework is enumeration of the total affected population. Existing estimates tend to be based on incomplete lists. In a study conducted over one year in North Liverpool, we compared crude prevalence rates for type 1 and type 2 diabetes with estimates obtained by capture-recapture (CR) analysis of multiple incomplete patient lists, to assess the extent of unascertained but diagnosed cases. Patient databases were constructed from six sources-a hospital diabetes centre; general practitioner registers; hospital admissions with a diagnosis of diabetes; a hospital diabetic retinal clinic; a research list of patients with diabetes admitted with stroke; and a local children's hospital. Log linear modelling was used to estimate missing cases, hence total prevalence. The crude prevalence of diabetes was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 1.52), compared with a CR-adjusted rate of 3.1% (CI 3.03, 3.19). Age-banded CR-adjusted prevalence was always higher in males than in females and the difference became more pronounced with increasing age. Among males, CR-adjusted prevalence rose from 0.4% at age 10-19 years to 18.3% at 80+ years; in females the corresponding figures were 0.4% and 9.3%. The gap between crude and CR-estimated prevalence points to a rate of 'hidden diabetes' that has substantial implications for future diabetes care.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Age Distribution

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Child

KW - Child, Preschool

KW - Diabetes Mellitus

KW - England

KW - Epidemiologic Methods

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infant

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Male

KW - Medical Records

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prevalence

KW - Sex Distribution

KW - Urban Health

KW - Journal Article

M3 - Article

C2 - 12835444

VL - 96

SP - 328

EP - 332

JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

SN - 0141-0768

IS - 7

ER -