Hidden diabetes in the UK: use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 96, No. 7, 07.2003, p. 328-32.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hidden diabetes in the UK
T2 - use of capture-recapture methods to estimate total prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an urban population
AU - Gill, Geoffrey V
AU - Ismail, Aziz A
AU - Beeching, Nicholas J
AU - Macfarlane, Sarah B J
AU - Bellis, Mark A
PY - 2003/7
Y1 - 2003/7
N2 - An early requirement of the UK's Diabetes National Service Framework is enumeration of the total affected population. Existing estimates tend to be based on incomplete lists. In a study conducted over one year in North Liverpool, we compared crude prevalence rates for type 1 and type 2 diabetes with estimates obtained by capture-recapture (CR) analysis of multiple incomplete patient lists, to assess the extent of unascertained but diagnosed cases. Patient databases were constructed from six sources-a hospital diabetes centre; general practitioner registers; hospital admissions with a diagnosis of diabetes; a hospital diabetic retinal clinic; a research list of patients with diabetes admitted with stroke; and a local children's hospital. Log linear modelling was used to estimate missing cases, hence total prevalence. The crude prevalence of diabetes was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 1.52), compared with a CR-adjusted rate of 3.1% (CI 3.03, 3.19). Age-banded CR-adjusted prevalence was always higher in males than in females and the difference became more pronounced with increasing age. Among males, CR-adjusted prevalence rose from 0.4% at age 10-19 years to 18.3% at 80+ years; in females the corresponding figures were 0.4% and 9.3%. The gap between crude and CR-estimated prevalence points to a rate of 'hidden diabetes' that has substantial implications for future diabetes care.
AB - An early requirement of the UK's Diabetes National Service Framework is enumeration of the total affected population. Existing estimates tend to be based on incomplete lists. In a study conducted over one year in North Liverpool, we compared crude prevalence rates for type 1 and type 2 diabetes with estimates obtained by capture-recapture (CR) analysis of multiple incomplete patient lists, to assess the extent of unascertained but diagnosed cases. Patient databases were constructed from six sources-a hospital diabetes centre; general practitioner registers; hospital admissions with a diagnosis of diabetes; a hospital diabetic retinal clinic; a research list of patients with diabetes admitted with stroke; and a local children's hospital. Log linear modelling was used to estimate missing cases, hence total prevalence. The crude prevalence of diabetes was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41, 1.52), compared with a CR-adjusted rate of 3.1% (CI 3.03, 3.19). Age-banded CR-adjusted prevalence was always higher in males than in females and the difference became more pronounced with increasing age. Among males, CR-adjusted prevalence rose from 0.4% at age 10-19 years to 18.3% at 80+ years; in females the corresponding figures were 0.4% and 9.3%. The gap between crude and CR-estimated prevalence points to a rate of 'hidden diabetes' that has substantial implications for future diabetes care.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Age Distribution
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Diabetes Mellitus
KW - England
KW - Epidemiologic Methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Infant
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Male
KW - Medical Records
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Prevalence
KW - Sex Distribution
KW - Urban Health
KW - Journal Article
M3 - Article
C2 - 12835444
VL - 96
SP - 328
EP - 332
JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
SN - 0141-0768
IS - 7
ER -