High-level language processing regions are not engaged in action observation or imitation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Brianna L Pritchett
    Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Caitlyn Hoeflin
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Kami Koldewyn
  • Eyal Dechter
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Evelina Fedorenko
    MGH, United States.

A set of left frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions respond robustly during language comprehension and production (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2010; Menenti et al. 2011). These regions have been further shown to be selective for language relative to other cognitive processes, including arithmetic, aspects of executive function, and music perception (e.g., Fedorenko et al. 2011; Monti et al. 2012). However, one claim about overlap between language and non-linguistic cognition remains prominent. In particular, some have argued that language processing shares computational demands with action observation and/or execution (e.g., Rizzolatti and Arbib 1998; Koechlin and Jubault 2006; Tettamanti and Weniger 2006). However, the evidence for these claims is indirect, based on observing activation for language and action tasks within the same broad anatomical areas (e.g., on the lateral surface of the left frontal lobe). To test whether language indeed shares machinery with action observation/execution, we examined the responses of language brain regions, defined functionally in each individual participant (Fedorenko et al. 2010), to action observation (Experiments 1, 2, 3a) and action imitation (Experiment 3b). With the exception of the language region in the angular gyrus, all language regions, including those in the inferior frontal gyrus (within "Broca's area"), showed little or no response during action observation/imitation. These results add to the growing body of literature suggesting that high-level language regions are highly selective for language processing (see Fedorenko and Varley 2016 for a review).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2555-2570
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume120
Issue number5
Early online date29 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations