Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct European populations.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  • Johanna Paijmans
    University of Potsdam
  • Axel Barlow
    University of Potsdam
  • Daniel W. Forster
    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
  • Kristin Henneberger
    University of Potsdam
  • Matthias Meyer
    Max Planck Institute
  • Birgit Nickel
    Max Planck Institute
  • Doris Nagel
    University of Vienna
  • Rasmus Worsoe Havmoller
    University of Copenhagen
  • Gennady Baryshnikov
    Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Ulrich Joger
    State Museum of Natural History Braunschweig
  • Wilfried Rosendahl
    Reiss-Engelhorn Museen and Curt-Engelhorn-Centre for Archaeometry
  • Michael Hofreiter
    University of Potsdam
Background

Resolving the historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) is a complex issue, because patterns inferred from fossils and from molecular data lack congruence. Fossil evidence supports an African origin, and suggests that leopards were already present in Eurasia during the Early Pleistocene. Analysis of DNA sequences however, suggests a more recent, Middle Pleistocene shared ancestry of Asian and African leopards. These contrasting patterns led researchers to propose a two-stage hypothesis of leopard dispersal out of Africa: an initial Early Pleistocene colonisation of Asia and a subsequent replacement by a second colonisation wave during the Middle Pleistocene. The status of Late Pleistocene European leopards within this scenario is unclear: were these populations remnants of the first dispersal, or do the last surviving European leopards share more recent ancestry with their African counterparts?
Results

In this study, we generate and analyse mitogenome sequences from historical samples that span the entire modern leopard distribution, as well as from Late Pleistocene remains. We find a deep bifurcation between African and Eurasian mitochondrial lineages (~ 710 Ka), with the European ancient samples as sister to all Asian lineages (~ 483 Ka). The modern and historical mainland Asian lineages share a relatively recent common ancestor (~ 122 Ka), and we find one Javan sample nested within these.
Conclusions

The phylogenetic placement of the ancient European leopard as sister group to Asian leopards suggests that these populations originate from the same out-of-Africa dispersal which founded the Asian lineages. The coalescence time found for the mitochondrial lineages aligns well with the earliest undisputed fossils in Eurasia, and thus encourages a re-evaluation of the identification of the much older putative leopard fossils from the region. The relatively recent ancestry of all mainland Asian leopard lineages suggests that these populations underwent a severe population bottleneck during the Pleistocene. Finally, although only based on a single sample, the unexpected phylogenetic placement of the Javan leopard could be interpreted as evidence for exchange of mitochondrial lineages between Java and mainland Asia, calling for further investigation into the evolutionary history of this subspecies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number156
JournalBMC Evolutionary Biology
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes
View graph of relations