How alliteration enhances conceptual–attentional interactions in reading

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

How alliteration enhances conceptual–attentional interactions in reading. / Egan, Ciara; Cristino, Filipe; Payne, Joshua et al.
In: Cortex, Vol. 124, 03.2020, p. 111-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Egan C, Cristino F, Payne J, Thierry G, Jones M. How alliteration enhances conceptual–attentional interactions in reading. Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:111-118. Epub 2019 Nov 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.005

Author

Egan, Ciara ; Cristino, Filipe ; Payne, Joshua et al. / How alliteration enhances conceptual–attentional interactions in reading. In: Cortex. 2020 ; Vol. 124. pp. 111-118.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How alliteration enhances conceptual–attentional interactions in reading

AU - Egan, Ciara

AU - Cristino, Filipe

AU - Payne, Joshua

AU - Thierry, Guillaume

AU - Jones, Manon

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - In linguistics, the relationship between phonological word form and meaning is mostly considered arbitrary. Why, then, do literary authors traditionally craft sound relationships between words? We set out to characterise how dynamic interactions between word form and meaning may account for this literary practice. Here, we show that alliteration influences both meaning integration and attentional engagement during reading. We presented participants with adjective-noun phrases, having manipulated semantic relatedness (congruent, incongruent) and form repetition (alliterating, non-alliterating) orthogonally, as in “dazzling-diamond”; “sparkling-diamond”; “dangerous-diamond”; and “creepy-diamond”. Using simultaneous recording of event-related brain potentials and pupil dilation (PD), we establish that, whilst semantic incongruency increased N400 amplitude as expected, it reduced PD, an index of attentional engagement. Second, alliteration affected semantic evaluation of word pairs, since it reduced N400 amplitude even in the case of unrelated items (e.g., “dangerous-diamond”). Third, alliteration specifically boosted attentional engagement for related words (e.g., “dazzling-diamond”), as shown by a sustained negative correlation between N400 amplitudes and PD change after the window of lexical integration. Thus, alliteration strategically arouses attention during reading and when comprehension is challenged, phonological information helps readers link concepts beyond the level of literal semantics. Overall, our findings provide a tentative mechanism for the empowering effect of sound repetition in literary constructs.

AB - In linguistics, the relationship between phonological word form and meaning is mostly considered arbitrary. Why, then, do literary authors traditionally craft sound relationships between words? We set out to characterise how dynamic interactions between word form and meaning may account for this literary practice. Here, we show that alliteration influences both meaning integration and attentional engagement during reading. We presented participants with adjective-noun phrases, having manipulated semantic relatedness (congruent, incongruent) and form repetition (alliterating, non-alliterating) orthogonally, as in “dazzling-diamond”; “sparkling-diamond”; “dangerous-diamond”; and “creepy-diamond”. Using simultaneous recording of event-related brain potentials and pupil dilation (PD), we establish that, whilst semantic incongruency increased N400 amplitude as expected, it reduced PD, an index of attentional engagement. Second, alliteration affected semantic evaluation of word pairs, since it reduced N400 amplitude even in the case of unrelated items (e.g., “dangerous-diamond”). Third, alliteration specifically boosted attentional engagement for related words (e.g., “dazzling-diamond”), as shown by a sustained negative correlation between N400 amplitudes and PD change after the window of lexical integration. Thus, alliteration strategically arouses attention during reading and when comprehension is challenged, phonological information helps readers link concepts beyond the level of literal semantics. Overall, our findings provide a tentative mechanism for the empowering effect of sound repetition in literary constructs.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 111

EP - 118

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -