How can we achieve a sustainable nuclear fuel cycle?

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Electronic versions

DOI

  • Laurence Harwood
    University of Reading
  • Ashfaq Afsar
    University of Reading
  • Jasraj Singh Babra
    University of Reading
  • Gary Bond
    University of Central Lancashire
  • Jaanus Burk
    University of Tartu
  • Sang June Choi
    Kyungpook National University, South Korea
  • Joseph Cowell
    University of Reading
  • Frederick Davis
    University of Reading
  • Petr Distler
    CTU Prague
  • Harry Eccles
    Kyungpook National University, South Korea
  • Chad Edwards
    University of Manchester
  • Andreas Geist
    Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
  • Mark E. Hodson
    University of Reading
  • Iain Hopkins
    University of Reading
  • Michael Hudson
    University of Reading
  • Alistair Holdsworth
    University of Manchester
  • Geungseok Jang
    Chungnam National University
  • Jiseon Jang
    Kyungpook National University, South Korea
  • Jan John
    CTU Prague
  • Dae Sung Lee
    Kyungpook National University, South Korea
  • Kyung Jin Lee
    Chungnam National University
  • Taek Seung Lee
    Chungnam National University
  • Frank Lewis
    University of Reading
  • Saeed Mohan
    University of Reading
  • Mark Ogden
    Sheffield University
  • Sarah Pepper
    Sheffield University
  • Zoe Selfe
    University of Reading
  • Elizabeth Shaw
    University of Reading
  • Clint Sharrad
    University of Manchester
  • Jong Soon Song
    Chosun University, South korea
  • Kaido Tamm
    University of Tartu
  • James Westwood
    University of Reading
  • Roger Whitehead
    University of Manchester
  • Karl Whittle
    University of Liverpool
Dealing with spent nuclear fuel is key if nuclear fission is to be used more widely going forward. Nuclear power is close to carbon neutral, but spent nuclear fuel has a storage lifetime of ~300,000 years. Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel is carried out on large scale using the PUREX “Plutonium Uranium Reduction and Extraction” process. The spent nuclear fuel is reduced to 15% of its original weight and the separated uranium and plutonium reused as “Mixed Oxide Fuel”. In the civil sector, this was carried out by the UK at Sellafield (now curtailed) and continues in France at La Hague. A plant in Rokashamura in Japan has been mothballed after the Fukushima accident. The residual waste must be stored for ~9,000 years with most of the remaining radiotoxicity due to traces of the minor actinides, neptunium, americium and curium, constituting just 0.1% of the original spent fuel. Separation of these minor actinides from the chemically very similar lanthanides (rare earths) in the last 15% of waste remaining after PUREX is the key step for future reprocessing. If separated, the minor actinides can be used as fuel in the next generation of nuclear reactors and converted into benign products, but lanthanides will cause the fission process to shut down if introduced into the reactor pile as they absorb neutrons efficiently. Removing the minor actinides from post PUREX waste will mean that the final residue need only be stored for 300 years. The highly challenging separation of the chemically very similar minor actinides from the lanthanides has been achieved using nitrogen-bearing organic ligands developed at Reading University. This can lead to significantly improved handling of spent nuclear fuels and means that waste nuclear fuel need not be a long-term storage liability but a source of yet more clean power.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2024
Externally publishedYes
EventIII 1H-TOXRUN International Congress - Porto, Portugal
Duration: 2 May 20243 May 2024

Conference

ConferenceIII 1H-TOXRUN International Congress
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityPorto
Period2/05/243/05/24
View graph of relations