Hundreds of millions of people in the tropics need both wild harvests and other forms of economic development for their well-being
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: One Earth, Vol. 7, No. 2, 02.2024, p. 311-324.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hundreds of millions of people in the tropics need both wild harvests and other forms of economic development for their well-being
AU - Wells, Geoff J.
AU - Ryan, Casey M.
AU - Das, Anamika
AU - Attiwilli, Suman
AU - Poudyal, Mahesh
AU - Lele, Sharachchandra
AU - Schreckenberg, Kate
AU - Robinson, Brian E.
AU - Keane, Aidan
AU - Homewood, Katherine M.
AU - Jones, Julia P.G.
AU - Torres-Vitolas, Carlos A.
AU - Fisher, Janet A.
AU - Ahmad, Sate
AU - Mulligan, Mark
AU - Dawson, Terence P.
AU - Adams, Helen
AU - Setty, R. Siddappa
AU - Daw, Tim M.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Summary Local access to “wild,” common-pool terrestrial and aquatic resources is being diminished by global resource demand and large-scale conservation interventions. Many theories suggest the well-being of wild harvesters can be supported through transitions to other livelihoods, improved infrastructure, and market access. However, new theories argue that such benefits may not always occur because they are context dependent and vary across dimensions of well-being. We test these theories by comparing how wild harvesting and other livelihoods have been associated with food security and life satisfaction in different contexts across ∼10,800 households in the tropics. Wild harvests coincided with high well-being in remote, asset-poor, and less-transformed landscapes. Yet, overall, well-being increased with electrical infrastructure, proximity to cities, and household capitals. This provides large-scale confirmation of the context dependence of nature’s contributions to people, and suggests a need to maintain local wild resource access while investing in equitable access to infrastructure, markets, and skills.
AB - Summary Local access to “wild,” common-pool terrestrial and aquatic resources is being diminished by global resource demand and large-scale conservation interventions. Many theories suggest the well-being of wild harvesters can be supported through transitions to other livelihoods, improved infrastructure, and market access. However, new theories argue that such benefits may not always occur because they are context dependent and vary across dimensions of well-being. We test these theories by comparing how wild harvesting and other livelihoods have been associated with food security and life satisfaction in different contexts across ∼10,800 households in the tropics. Wild harvests coincided with high well-being in remote, asset-poor, and less-transformed landscapes. Yet, overall, well-being increased with electrical infrastructure, proximity to cities, and household capitals. This provides large-scale confirmation of the context dependence of nature’s contributions to people, and suggests a need to maintain local wild resource access while investing in equitable access to infrastructure, markets, and skills.
KW - nature’s contributions to people
KW - ecosystem services
KW - multi-dimensional wellbeing
KW - social-ecological systems
KW - environmental income
KW - conservation
KW - international development
U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.001
M3 - Article
VL - 7
SP - 311
EP - 324
JO - One Earth
JF - One Earth
SN - 2590-3322
IS - 2
ER -