Identifying and resisting the technological drift: green space, blue space and ecotherapy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Identifying and resisting the technological drift: green space, blue space and ecotherapy. / Lord, Ed; Coffey, Michael.
In: Social Theory and Health, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.03.2021, p. 110-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Lord E, Coffey M. Identifying and resisting the technological drift: green space, blue space and ecotherapy. Social Theory and Health. 2021 Mar 1;19(1):110-125. Epub 2019 Feb 26. doi: 10.1057/s41285-019-00099-9

Author

Lord, Ed ; Coffey, Michael. / Identifying and resisting the technological drift: green space, blue space and ecotherapy. In: Social Theory and Health. 2021 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 110-125.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying and resisting the technological drift: green space, blue space and ecotherapy

AU - Lord, Ed

AU - Coffey, Michael

PY - 2021/3/1

Y1 - 2021/3/1

N2 - There has been a growing interest in recent years into the health and well-being benefits of natural ‘green’ and ‘blue’ spaces. This theoretical paper presents a critical review of the proposed ways to operationalise these benefits for mental health. Following the social theories of Ellul and Bohme—in which technology is defined as a system of rules and rationality rather than devices and hardware—we propose that a process of ‘technological drift’ occurs when a body of evidence is put into practice in human activities (operationalised). We identify a technological colonisation of nature, in which nature itself is assimilated into a technological niche to act as a ‘technical solution to a technical problem’. Examples of this are the use of medical language like ‘dose’ and ‘prescription’, the attempt to separate effect mechanisms and pathways and the professionalisation and division of labour. Technological drift in nature exposure and health is congruent with a wider efficiency culture that reduces nature to a resource for human use. In conclusion, we propose that nature exposure could be not just an adjunct to healthcare systems but also disruptive to them in a positive and emancipatory way.

AB - There has been a growing interest in recent years into the health and well-being benefits of natural ‘green’ and ‘blue’ spaces. This theoretical paper presents a critical review of the proposed ways to operationalise these benefits for mental health. Following the social theories of Ellul and Bohme—in which technology is defined as a system of rules and rationality rather than devices and hardware—we propose that a process of ‘technological drift’ occurs when a body of evidence is put into practice in human activities (operationalised). We identify a technological colonisation of nature, in which nature itself is assimilated into a technological niche to act as a ‘technical solution to a technical problem’. Examples of this are the use of medical language like ‘dose’ and ‘prescription’, the attempt to separate effect mechanisms and pathways and the professionalisation and division of labour. Technological drift in nature exposure and health is congruent with a wider efficiency culture that reduces nature to a resource for human use. In conclusion, we propose that nature exposure could be not just an adjunct to healthcare systems but also disruptive to them in a positive and emancipatory way.

KW - Mental Health

KW - green spaces

KW - technology

KW - ecotherapy

KW - Jacques Ellul

U2 - 10.1057/s41285-019-00099-9

DO - 10.1057/s41285-019-00099-9

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 110

EP - 125

JO - Social Theory and Health

JF - Social Theory and Health

SN - 1477-8211

IS - 1

ER -