Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system. / Ford, Hilary; Garbutt, Angus; Jones, Davey L. et al.
In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 162, 01.11.2012, p. 108-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Ford H, Garbutt A, Jones DL, Jones L. Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2012 Nov 1;162:108-115. Epub 2012 Sept 30. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.003

Author

Ford, Hilary ; Garbutt, Angus ; Jones, Davey L. et al. / Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2012 ; Vol. 162. pp. 108-115.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system

AU - Ford, Hilary

AU - Garbutt, Angus

AU - Jones, Davey L.

AU - Jones, Laurence

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - A coastal grassland was used as a model system to examine how grazing management, un-grazed (for six years), rabbit grazed or fully grazed (ponies 0.2 ha−1, cattle 0.05 ha−1 and rabbits 45 ha−1), affected biodiversity and ecosystem service provision, by measuring an extensive suite of biophysical variables as proxies for ecosystem services. For ‘supporting services’, nutrient cycling was greatest in un-grazed grassland but primary productivity did not differ. The ‘provisioning service’ of food production was only provided by fully grazed grassland. For grazing effects on ‘regulating services’ total carbon (C) stock did not differ and effects on pest regulating invertebrates and pollinator abundance were variable. The potential for flood control was considered greatest in the un-grazed grassland; with faster water infiltration than in the fully grazed grassland. The ‘cultural service’ of environmental appreciation was considered higher in fully grazed grassland due to significantly greater plant species richness, more forb species and more forbs flowering than in un-grazed grassland.

AB - A coastal grassland was used as a model system to examine how grazing management, un-grazed (for six years), rabbit grazed or fully grazed (ponies 0.2 ha−1, cattle 0.05 ha−1 and rabbits 45 ha−1), affected biodiversity and ecosystem service provision, by measuring an extensive suite of biophysical variables as proxies for ecosystem services. For ‘supporting services’, nutrient cycling was greatest in un-grazed grassland but primary productivity did not differ. The ‘provisioning service’ of food production was only provided by fully grazed grassland. For grazing effects on ‘regulating services’ total carbon (C) stock did not differ and effects on pest regulating invertebrates and pollinator abundance were variable. The potential for flood control was considered greatest in the un-grazed grassland; with faster water infiltration than in the fully grazed grassland. The ‘cultural service’ of environmental appreciation was considered higher in fully grazed grassland due to significantly greater plant species richness, more forb species and more forbs flowering than in un-grazed grassland.

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 108

EP - 115

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

ER -