Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 277, No. 12, 12.2020, p. 3435-3447.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial
AU - Rogers, Simon N.
AU - Allmark, Christine
AU - Bekiroglu, Fazilet
AU - Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
AU - Fabbroni, Gillon
AU - Flavel, Robert
AU - Highet, Victoria
AU - Ho, Michael W. S.
AU - Humphris, Gerald M.
AU - Jones, Terry M.
AU - Khattak, Owais
AU - Lancaster, Jeffrey
AU - Loh, Christopher
AU - Lowe, Derek
AU - Lowies, Cher
AU - Macareavy, Dominic
AU - Moor, James
AU - Ong, T. K.
AU - Prasai, A.
AU - Roland, Nicholas
AU - Semple, Cherith
AU - Spencer, Llinos Haf
AU - Tandon, Sank
AU - Thomas, Steven J.
AU - Schache, Andrew
AU - Shaw, Richard J.
AU - Kanatas, Anastasios
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Abstract: Purpose: The main aim of this paper is to present baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and HRQOL in the two groups of the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) trial. The baseline PCI data will also be described. Methods: This is a pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultant clusters from two sites either ‘using' (n = 8) or ‘not using’ (n = 7) the PCI at a clinic for all of their trial patients. The PCI is a 56-item prompt list that helps patients raise concerns that otherwise might be missed. Eligibility was head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent (all sites, stage of disease, treatments). Results: From 511 patients first identified as eligible when screening for the multi-disciplinary tumour board meetings, 288 attended a first routine outpatient baseline study clinic after completion of their treatment, median (IQR) of 103 (71–162) days. At baseline, the two trial groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as in HRQOL measures apart from differences in tumour location, tumour staging and mode of treatment. These exceptions were cluster (consultant) related to Maxillofacial and ENT consultants seeing different types of cases. Consultation times were similar, with PCI group times taking about 1 min longer on average (95% CL for the difference between means was from − 0.7 to + 2.2 min). Conclusion: Using the PCI in routine post-treatment head and neck cancer clinics do not elongate consultations. Recruitment has finished but 12-month follow-up is still ongoing.
AB - Abstract: Purpose: The main aim of this paper is to present baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and HRQOL in the two groups of the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) trial. The baseline PCI data will also be described. Methods: This is a pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultant clusters from two sites either ‘using' (n = 8) or ‘not using’ (n = 7) the PCI at a clinic for all of their trial patients. The PCI is a 56-item prompt list that helps patients raise concerns that otherwise might be missed. Eligibility was head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent (all sites, stage of disease, treatments). Results: From 511 patients first identified as eligible when screening for the multi-disciplinary tumour board meetings, 288 attended a first routine outpatient baseline study clinic after completion of their treatment, median (IQR) of 103 (71–162) days. At baseline, the two trial groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as in HRQOL measures apart from differences in tumour location, tumour staging and mode of treatment. These exceptions were cluster (consultant) related to Maxillofacial and ENT consultants seeing different types of cases. Consultation times were similar, with PCI group times taking about 1 min longer on average (95% CL for the difference between means was from − 0.7 to + 2.2 min). Conclusion: Using the PCI in routine post-treatment head and neck cancer clinics do not elongate consultations. Recruitment has finished but 12-month follow-up is still ongoing.
KW - Head and Neck
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Intervention
KW - Prompt list
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Randomised trial
KW - Patient concerns inventory
KW - Cluster preference
U2 - 10.1007/s00405-020-06077-6
DO - 10.1007/s00405-020-06077-6
M3 - Article
VL - 277
SP - 3435
EP - 3447
JO - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
SN - 0937-4477
IS - 12
ER -