Intervention or mere provision of physical facilities? Has the ECJ clarified the distinction?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Discusses Foreningen Svenska Tonsattares Internationella Musikbyra upa (Stim) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB (C-753/18) (ECJ) on whether short-term hire of vehicles with radio receivers to private clients constituted a "communication to the public" under Directive 2001/29 art.3(1) and Directive 2006/115 art.8. Notes the distinction between a user's act of intervention and the mere provision of physical facilities, and considers the case's implications
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-209
JournalEuropean Intellectual Property Review
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020
View graph of relations