Intervention or mere provision of physical facilities? Has the ECJ clarified the distinction?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Discusses Foreningen Svenska Tonsattares Internationella Musikbyra upa (Stim) v Fleetmanager Sweden AB (C-753/18) (ECJ) on whether short-term hire of vehicles with radio receivers to private clients constituted a "communication to the public" under Directive 2001/29 art.3(1) and Directive 2006/115 art.8. Notes the distinction between a user's act of intervention and the mere provision of physical facilities, and considers the case's implications
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 207-209 |
| Journal | European Intellectual Property Review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |