Interventions for and experiences of shared decision-making underpinning reproductive health, family planning options and pregnancy for women with or at high risk of kidney disease: a systematic review and qualitative framework synthesis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Electronic versions
Documents
- Interventions for and experiences of shared decision-making underpinning reproductive health
Final published version, 973 KB, PDF document
Licence: CC BY-NC Show licence
DOI
OBJECTIVE: To determine intervention effects and synthesise qualitative research that explored women with or at high risk of kidney disease experiences of shared decision-making in relation to their reproductive health, family planning options and pregnancy.
DESIGN: A systematic review of interventions and a qualitative evidence synthesis.
DATA SOURCES: We searched Cochrane, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, Elsevier, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Shared decision-making interventions and qualitative studies related to reproductive health involving women with or at high risk of kidney disease published from 1980 until January 2021 in English (clinical settings, global perspective).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria and full-text articles were reviewed by the whole team. Framework synthesis was undertaken.
RESULTS: We screened 1898 studies. No evidence-based interventions were identified. 18 qualitative studies were included, 11 kidney disease-specific studies and 7 where kidney disease was a common comorbidity. Women frequently felt unprepared and uninformed about their reproductive options. Conversations with healthcare professionals were commonly described as frustrating and unhelpful, often due to a perceived loss of autonomy and a mismatch in preferences and life goals. Examples of shared decision-making were rare. Kidney disease exacerbated societal expectations of traditional gender roles (eg, wife, mother, carer) including capability to have children and associated factors, for example, parenting, (sexual) relationships, body image and independent living (including financial barriers to starting a family). Local interventions were limited to types of counselling. A new health system model was developed to support new interventions.
CONCLUSION: There is a clear need to establish new interventions, test those already in development and develop new clinical guidance for the management of women with or at high risk of kidney disease in relation to their reproductive health, including options to preserve fertility earlier. Other health conditions with established personalised reproductive care packages, for example, cancer, could be used to benchmark kidney practice alongside the new model developed here.
Keywords
- Child, Family Planning Services, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Kidney Diseases/therapy, Pregnancy, Qualitative Research, Reproductive Health
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e062392 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 8 Aug 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 8 Aug 2022 |