Introducing a common taxonomy to support learning from failure in conservation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 37, No. 1, e13967, 02.2023.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Introducing a common taxonomy to support learning from failure in conservation
AU - Dickson, Iain
AU - Butchart, Stuart H. M.
AU - Catalano, Allison
AU - Gibbons, David
AU - Jones, Julia P. G.
AU - Lee-Brooks, Katie
AU - Oldfield, Thomasina
AU - Noble, David
AU - Paterson, Stuart
AU - Roy, Sugoto
AU - Semelin, Julien
AU - Tinsley-Marshall, Paul
AU - Trevelyan, Rosie
AU - Wauchope, Hannah
AU - Wicander, Sylvia
AU - Sutherland, William J.
N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Although some sectors have made significant progress in learning from failure, there is currently limited consensus on how a similar transition could best be achieved in conservation and what is required to facilitate this. One of the key enabling conditions for other sectors is a widely accepted and standardized classification system for identifying and analyzing root causes of failure. We devised a comprehensive taxonomy of root causes of failure affecting conservation projects. To develop this, we solicited examples of real-life conservation efforts that were deemed to have failed in some way, identified their underlying root causes of failure, and used these to develop a generic, 3-tier taxonomy of the ways in which projects fail, at the top of which are 6 overarching cause categories that are further divided into midlevel cause categories and specific root causes. We tested the taxonomy by asking conservation practitioners to use it to classify the causes of failure for conservation efforts they had been involved in. No significant gaps or redundancies were identified during this testing phase. We then analyzed the frequency that particular root causes were encountered by projects within this test sample, which suggested that some root causes were more likely to be encountered than others and that a small number of root causes were more likely to be encountered by projects implementing particular types of conservation action. Our taxonomy could be used to improve identification, analysis, and subsequent learning from failed conservation efforts, address some of the barriers that currently limit the ability of conservation practitioners to learn from failure, and contribute to establishing an effective culture of learning from failure within conservation.
AB - Although some sectors have made significant progress in learning from failure, there is currently limited consensus on how a similar transition could best be achieved in conservation and what is required to facilitate this. One of the key enabling conditions for other sectors is a widely accepted and standardized classification system for identifying and analyzing root causes of failure. We devised a comprehensive taxonomy of root causes of failure affecting conservation projects. To develop this, we solicited examples of real-life conservation efforts that were deemed to have failed in some way, identified their underlying root causes of failure, and used these to develop a generic, 3-tier taxonomy of the ways in which projects fail, at the top of which are 6 overarching cause categories that are further divided into midlevel cause categories and specific root causes. We tested the taxonomy by asking conservation practitioners to use it to classify the causes of failure for conservation efforts they had been involved in. No significant gaps or redundancies were identified during this testing phase. We then analyzed the frequency that particular root causes were encountered by projects within this test sample, which suggested that some root causes were more likely to be encountered than others and that a small number of root causes were more likely to be encountered by projects implementing particular types of conservation action. Our taxonomy could be used to improve identification, analysis, and subsequent learning from failed conservation efforts, address some of the barriers that currently limit the ability of conservation practitioners to learn from failure, and contribute to establishing an effective culture of learning from failure within conservation.
KW - failure
KW - classification
KW - learning
KW - adaptive management
KW - reflection
KW - informing solutions
U2 - 10.1111/cobi.13967
DO - 10.1111/cobi.13967
M3 - Article
C2 - 35694785
VL - 37
JO - Conservation Biology
JF - Conservation Biology
SN - 0888-8892
IS - 1
M1 - e13967
ER -