Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 112 , No. Suppl 1, 31.03.2015, p. S92-107.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes?
T2 - Systematic review
AU - Neal, R D
AU - Tharmanathan, P
AU - France, B
AU - Din, N U
AU - Cotton, S
AU - Fallon-Ferguson, J
AU - Hamilton, W
AU - Hendry, A
AU - Hendry, M
AU - Lewis, Ruth
AU - Macleod, U
AU - Mitchell, E D
AU - Pickett, M
AU - Rai, T
AU - Shaw, K
AU - Stuart, N
AU - Tørring, M L
AU - Wilkinson, C
AU - Williams, B
AU - Williams, Nefyn
AU - Emery, J
PY - 2015/3/31
Y1 - 2015/3/31
N2 - background: It is unclear whether more timely cancer diagnosis brings favourable outcomes, with much of the previous evidence, in some cancers, being equivocal. We set out to determine whether there is an association between time to diagnosis, treatment and clinical outcomes, across all cancers for symptomatic presentations. methods: Systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis. results: We included 177 articles reporting 209 studies. These studies varied in study design, the time intervals assessed and the outcomes reported. Study quality was variable, with a small number of higher-quality studies. Heterogeneity precluded definitive findings. The cancers with more reports of an association between shorter times to diagnosis and more favourable outcomes were breast, colorectal, head and neck, testicular and melanoma. conclusions: This is the first review encompassing many cancer types, and we have demonstrated those cancers in which more evidence of an association between shorter times to diagnosis and more favourable outcomes exists, and where it is lacking. We believe that it is reasonable to assume that efforts to expedite the diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are likely to have benefits for patients in terms of improved survival, earlier-stage diagnosis and improved quality of life, although these benefits vary between cancers.
AB - background: It is unclear whether more timely cancer diagnosis brings favourable outcomes, with much of the previous evidence, in some cancers, being equivocal. We set out to determine whether there is an association between time to diagnosis, treatment and clinical outcomes, across all cancers for symptomatic presentations. methods: Systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis. results: We included 177 articles reporting 209 studies. These studies varied in study design, the time intervals assessed and the outcomes reported. Study quality was variable, with a small number of higher-quality studies. Heterogeneity precluded definitive findings. The cancers with more reports of an association between shorter times to diagnosis and more favourable outcomes were breast, colorectal, head and neck, testicular and melanoma. conclusions: This is the first review encompassing many cancer types, and we have demonstrated those cancers in which more evidence of an association between shorter times to diagnosis and more favourable outcomes exists, and where it is lacking. We believe that it is reasonable to assume that efforts to expedite the diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are likely to have benefits for patients in terms of improved survival, earlier-stage diagnosis and improved quality of life, although these benefits vary between cancers.
KW - Delayed Diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Prognosis
KW - Time-to-Treatment
KW - Journal Article
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
KW - Review
U2 - 10.1038/bjc.2015.48
DO - 10.1038/bjc.2015.48
M3 - Article
C2 - 25734382
VL - 112
SP - S92-107
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
SN - 0007-0920
IS - Suppl 1
ER -