Standard Standard

Is the Journey More Important than the Destination? EU Accession and Corporate Governance and Performance of Banks. / Onal, Mehmet Maksud ; Ashton, John.
In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 59, No. 6, 11.2021, p. 1516-1535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Onal MM, Ashton J. Is the Journey More Important than the Destination? EU Accession and Corporate Governance and Performance of Banks. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2021 Nov;59(6):1516-1535. Epub 2021 May 13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13198

Author

Onal, Mehmet Maksud ; Ashton, John. / Is the Journey More Important than the Destination? EU Accession and Corporate Governance and Performance of Banks. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2021 ; Vol. 59, No. 6. pp. 1516-1535.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the Journey More Important than the Destination?

T2 - EU Accession and Corporate Governance and Performance of Banks

AU - Onal, Mehmet Maksud

AU - Ashton, John

N1 - 24 months embargo

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - This paper examines how accession to and subsequent membership of the European Union (EU) has influenced the dissemination of corporate governance characteristics and financial performance of the banking industry. Using a hand-collected, cross-national dataset from EU member and candidate states the analysis indicates the candidacy period is associated with the better financial performance of banks than the latter period of EU membership. EU membership also has a significant negative influence on the take up some corporate governance arrangements. We infer this result is consistent with instrumental rationality explanations of Europeanization. While the process of accession has brought benefits, these are not always reinforced by subsequent EU membership.

AB - This paper examines how accession to and subsequent membership of the European Union (EU) has influenced the dissemination of corporate governance characteristics and financial performance of the banking industry. Using a hand-collected, cross-national dataset from EU member and candidate states the analysis indicates the candidacy period is associated with the better financial performance of banks than the latter period of EU membership. EU membership also has a significant negative influence on the take up some corporate governance arrangements. We infer this result is consistent with instrumental rationality explanations of Europeanization. While the process of accession has brought benefits, these are not always reinforced by subsequent EU membership.

KW - Accession

KW - corporate governance

KW - institutions

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13198

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13198

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 1516

EP - 1535

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - 6

ER -