Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Journal of Operations Management, 2018.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Judgmental Selection of Forecasting Models
AU - Petropoulos, Fotios
AU - Kourentzes, Nikolas
AU - Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Siemsen, Enno
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In this paper, we explored how judgment can be used to improve the selection of a forecasting model. We compared the performance of judgmental model selection against a standard algorithm based on information criteria. We also examined the efficacy of a judgmental model-build approach, in which experts were asked to decide on the existence of the structural components (trend and seasonality) of the time series instead of directly selecting a model from a choice set. Our behavioral study used data from almost 700 participants, including forecasting practitioners. The results from our experiment suggest that selectingmodels judgmentally results in performance that is on par, if not better, to that of algorithmic selection. Further, judgmental model selection helps to avoid the worst models more frequently compared to algorithmic selection. Finally, a simple combination of the statistical and judgmental selections and judgmental aggregation significantly outperform both statistical and judgmental selections
AB - In this paper, we explored how judgment can be used to improve the selection of a forecasting model. We compared the performance of judgmental model selection against a standard algorithm based on information criteria. We also examined the efficacy of a judgmental model-build approach, in which experts were asked to decide on the existence of the structural components (trend and seasonality) of the time series instead of directly selecting a model from a choice set. Our behavioral study used data from almost 700 participants, including forecasting practitioners. The results from our experiment suggest that selectingmodels judgmentally results in performance that is on par, if not better, to that of algorithmic selection. Further, judgmental model selection helps to avoid the worst models more frequently compared to algorithmic selection. Finally, a simple combination of the statistical and judgmental selections and judgmental aggregation significantly outperform both statistical and judgmental selections
KW - Model selection
KW - Behavioral operations
KW - Decomposition
KW - Combination
U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005
M3 - Article
JO - Journal of Operations Management
JF - Journal of Operations Management
SN - 0272-6963
ER -