Electronic versions

Documents

Links

DOI

  • Christian E. Salas
    Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago
  • Osvaldo Castro
    Universidad Autonoma De Chile, San Miguel
  • Kenneth St. Yuen
    Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
  • Darinka Radovic
    Manchester University
  • Giovanni D-Avossa
  • Oliver H. Turnbull
Introduction: Historically, emotion regulation problems have been reported as a common consequence of right prefrontal cortex (rPFC) damage. It has been proposed that the rPFC, particularly the rIFG, has a key role inhibiting prepotent reflexive actions, thus contributing to emotion regulation and self-regulation. This study is the first to directly explore this hypothesis, by testing whether damage to the rIFG compromises the voluntary modulation of emotional responses, and whether performance on inhibition tasks is associated with emotion regulation. Method: 10 individuals with unilateral right prefrontal damage and 15 matched healthy controls were compared on a well-known response modulation task. During the task participants had to amplify and suppress their facial emotional expressions, while watching film clips eliciting amusement. Measures of executive control, emotion regulation strategies usage and symptomatology were also collected. Results: As a group, individuals with rPFC damage presented a significantly reduced range of response modulation compared with controls. In addition, performance in the suppression task was associated with measures of cognitive inhibition and suppression usage. Interestingly, these effects were driven primarily by a subgroup of individuals with rPFC damage, all of whom also had damage to the right posterior insula, and who presented a marked impairment in suppressing facial emotional expressions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1528-1540
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume11
Issue number10
Early online date17 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations