Knowingly not wanting to know: Discourses of people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Dementia, Vol. 15, No. 2, 09.2016, p. 1246–1259.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowingly not wanting to know: Discourses of people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment
AU - Pierce, Sian
AU - Lamers, Carolien
AU - Salisbury, Katie
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - Mild cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous clinical state whereby assessed cognitive changes over time may progress to dementia, remain stable or revert to back to normal. This study aimed to identify, through discourse analysis, how people with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment used language in order to reveal the societal views and shared meanings of the diagnosis, and the positionstaken by people. Seven peoplewith mild cognitive impairment were interviewed, and three discourses emerged during analysis. One of the discourses revealed was ‘Not Knowing’ about mild cognitive impairment. Furthermore, in the absence of a coherent discourse related to mild cognitive impairment, participants went on to position themselves between two more familiar discourse;‘Knowing’ about ageing and dying and ‘Not Wanting to Know’ about dementia. Clinicians must consider how information is presented to people about mild cognitive impairment, including where mild cognitive impairment is positioned in respect to normal ageing and dementia.
AB - Mild cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous clinical state whereby assessed cognitive changes over time may progress to dementia, remain stable or revert to back to normal. This study aimed to identify, through discourse analysis, how people with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment used language in order to reveal the societal views and shared meanings of the diagnosis, and the positionstaken by people. Seven peoplewith mild cognitive impairment were interviewed, and three discourses emerged during analysis. One of the discourses revealed was ‘Not Knowing’ about mild cognitive impairment. Furthermore, in the absence of a coherent discourse related to mild cognitive impairment, participants went on to position themselves between two more familiar discourse;‘Knowing’ about ageing and dying and ‘Not Wanting to Know’ about dementia. Clinicians must consider how information is presented to people about mild cognitive impairment, including where mild cognitive impairment is positioned in respect to normal ageing and dementia.
U2 - DOI: 10.1177/1471301215600895
DO - DOI: 10.1177/1471301215600895
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 1246
EP - 1259
JO - Dementia
JF - Dementia
SN - 1471-3012
IS - 2
ER -