Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better. / Allen, Benjamin L.; Allen, Lee R.; Andrien, Henrik et al.
In: Food Webs, Vol. 13, 01.12.2017, p. 49-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Allen, BL, Allen, LR, Andrien, H, Ballard, G, Boitani, L, Engeman, RM, Fleming, PJS, Ford, AT, Haswell, P, Kowalczyk, R, Linnell, JDC, Mech, LD & Parker, DM 2017, 'Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better', Food Webs, vol. 13, pp. 49-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

APA

Allen, B. L., Allen, L. R., Andrien, H., Ballard, G., Boitani, L., Engeman, R. M., Fleming, P. J. S., Ford, A. T., Haswell, P., Kowalczyk, R., Linnell, J. D. C., Mech, L. D., & Parker, D. M. (2017). Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better. Food Webs, 13, 49-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

CBE

Allen BL, Allen LR, Andrien H, Ballard G, Boitani L, Engeman RM, Fleming PJS, Ford AT, Haswell P, Kowalczyk R, et al. 2017. Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better. Food Webs. 13:49-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Allen BL, Allen LR, Andrien H, Ballard G, Boitani L, Engeman RM et al. Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better. Food Webs. 2017 Dec 1;13:49-50. Epub 2017 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

Author

Allen, Benjamin L. ; Allen, Lee R. ; Andrien, Henrik et al. / Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better. In: Food Webs. 2017 ; Vol. 13. pp. 49-50.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better

AU - Allen, Benjamin L.

AU - Allen, Lee R.

AU - Andrien, Henrik

AU - Ballard, Guy

AU - Boitani, Luigi

AU - Engeman, Richard M.

AU - Fleming, Peter J.S.

AU - Ford, Adam T.

AU - Haswell, Peter

AU - Kowalczyk, Rafal

AU - Linnell, John D. C.

AU - Mech, L. David

AU - Parker, Daniel M.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - We recently described the following six interrelated issues that justify questioning some of the discourse about the reliability of the literature on the ecological roles of large carnivores (Allen et al. In press): 1. The overall paucity of available data, 2. The reliability of carnivore population sampling techniques, 3. The general disregard for alternative hypotheses to top-down forcing, 4. The lack of applied science studies, 5. The frequent use of logical fallacies, 6. The generalisation of results from relatively pristine systems to those substantially altered by humans.

AB - We recently described the following six interrelated issues that justify questioning some of the discourse about the reliability of the literature on the ecological roles of large carnivores (Allen et al. In press): 1. The overall paucity of available data, 2. The reliability of carnivore population sampling techniques, 3. The general disregard for alternative hypotheses to top-down forcing, 4. The lack of applied science studies, 5. The frequent use of logical fallacies, 6. The generalisation of results from relatively pristine systems to those substantially altered by humans.

U2 - 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 49

EP - 50

JO - Food Webs

JF - Food Webs

SN - 2352-2496

ER -