Mechanisms underlying the (re)alignment of covert and overt visual attention
Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
Standard Standard
2018. Poster session presented at 41st European Conference on Visual Perception, Trieste, Italy.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Poster › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - Mechanisms underlying the (re)alignment of covert and overt visual attention
AU - Korolczuk, Inga
AU - Houghton, George
AU - Leek, Charles
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - It is widely assumed that attention comprises overt and covert orienting mechanisms. Following a peripheral cue covert and overt attention can be decoupled. But how are they subsequently realigned? We examined whether realignment towards a fixated (central) location is determined solely by the time since cue onset, or whether it is also influenced by the spatial location of a subsequent reorienting cue. We used the spatial cueing paradigm to examine this in the context of inhibition of return (IOR) - i.e., slower target detection at previously cued locations. After an exogenous cue, a reorienting cue was shown at either central fixation or peripherally. IOR was greater following the central than the peripheral re-orienting cue. This indicates that the direction of realignment modulates inhibition of previously-cued locations. We propose that stronger inhibition arising from central reorienting cues reflects a fundamental bias to realign covert and overt attention at a central fixation.
AB - It is widely assumed that attention comprises overt and covert orienting mechanisms. Following a peripheral cue covert and overt attention can be decoupled. But how are they subsequently realigned? We examined whether realignment towards a fixated (central) location is determined solely by the time since cue onset, or whether it is also influenced by the spatial location of a subsequent reorienting cue. We used the spatial cueing paradigm to examine this in the context of inhibition of return (IOR) - i.e., slower target detection at previously cued locations. After an exogenous cue, a reorienting cue was shown at either central fixation or peripherally. IOR was greater following the central than the peripheral re-orienting cue. This indicates that the direction of realignment modulates inhibition of previously-cued locations. We propose that stronger inhibition arising from central reorienting cues reflects a fundamental bias to realign covert and overt attention at a central fixation.
M3 - Poster
T2 - 41st European Conference on Visual Perception
Y2 - 26 August 2018 through 30 August 2018
ER -