Research Portal

Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard Standard

Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore. / Pryce, Huw; Owen, Gwilym.
In: Journal of Legal History, Vol. 35, No. 2, 07.2014, p. 172-199.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

HarvardHarvard

Pryce, H & Owen, G 2014, 'Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore', Journal of Legal History, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 172-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

APA

Pryce, H., & Owen, G. (2014). Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore. Journal of Legal History, 35(2), 172-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

CBE

Pryce H, Owen G. 2014. Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore. Journal of Legal History. 35(2):172-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

MLA

Pryce, Huw and Gwilym Owen. "Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore". Journal of Legal History. 2014, 35(2). 172-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

VancouverVancouver

Pryce H, Owen G. Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore. Journal of Legal History. 2014 Jul;35(2):172-199. Epub 2014 Jul 4. doi: 10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

Author

Pryce, Huw ; Owen, Gwilym. / Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore. In: Journal of Legal History. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 172-199.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medieval Welsh Law and the Mid-Victorian Foreshore

AU - Pryce, Huw

AU - Owen, Gwilym

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - In 1862 a text of medieval Welsh law, attributed to the tenth-century king Hywel Dda (Hywel the Good), was cited as part of the defence in a case, Attorney General v Jones, concerning disputed foreshore rights in Anglesey, north Wales. This article aims to explain why and how Welsh law, effectively abolished by the Acts of Union of 1536–43, was deployed as evidence in the case and how far this marked a readiness to accommodate the distinctive legal heritage of Wales within the framework of the nineteenth-century common law. As well as analysing the legal arguments presented, the article seeks to assess the broader significance of the case by setting it in the contexts of the Crown's increasingly vigorous claims to foreshores, the circumstances and attitudes of the real defendant, William Bulkeley Hughes, and antiquarian study of the medieval Welsh law-texts, including their use in previous mid-Victorian foreshore disputes.

AB - In 1862 a text of medieval Welsh law, attributed to the tenth-century king Hywel Dda (Hywel the Good), was cited as part of the defence in a case, Attorney General v Jones, concerning disputed foreshore rights in Anglesey, north Wales. This article aims to explain why and how Welsh law, effectively abolished by the Acts of Union of 1536–43, was deployed as evidence in the case and how far this marked a readiness to accommodate the distinctive legal heritage of Wales within the framework of the nineteenth-century common law. As well as analysing the legal arguments presented, the article seeks to assess the broader significance of the case by setting it in the contexts of the Crown's increasingly vigorous claims to foreshores, the circumstances and attitudes of the real defendant, William Bulkeley Hughes, and antiquarian study of the medieval Welsh law-texts, including their use in previous mid-Victorian foreshore disputes.

U2 - 10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

DO - 10.1080/01440365.2014.925179

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 172

EP - 199

JO - Journal of Legal History

JF - Journal of Legal History

SN - 0144-0365

IS - 2

ER -