Microplastics alter multiple biological processes of marine benthic fauna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Microplastics alter multiple biological processes of marine benthic fauna. / Mason, Victoria; Skov, Martin; Hiddink, Jan Geert et al.
In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 845, 157362, 01.11.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

APA

CBE

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Mason V, Skov M, Hiddink JG, Walton M. Microplastics alter multiple biological processes of marine benthic fauna. Science of the Total Environment. 2022 Nov 1;845:157362. Epub 2022 Jul 16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157362

Author

Mason, Victoria ; Skov, Martin ; Hiddink, Jan Geert et al. / Microplastics alter multiple biological processes of marine benthic fauna. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2022 ; Vol. 845.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microplastics alter multiple biological processes of marine benthic fauna

AU - Mason, Victoria

AU - Skov, Martin

AU - Hiddink, Jan Geert

AU - Walton, Mark

PY - 2022/11/1

Y1 - 2022/11/1

N2 - Marine sediments are a sink for microplastics, making seabed organisms particularly exposed. We used meta-analysis to reveal general patterns in a surge in experimental studies and to test for microplastic impact on biological processes including invertebrate feeding, survival and energetics. Using Hedge's effect size (g), which assesses the mean response of organisms exposed to microplastics compared to control groups, we found negative impacts (significant negative g values) across all life stages (overall effect size (g) = −0.57 95 % CI [−0.76, −0.38]), with embryos most strongly affected (g = −1.47 [−2.21, −0.74]). Six of seven biological process rates were negatively impacted by microplastic exposure, including development, reproduction, growth and feeding. Survival strongly decreased (g = −0.69 [−1.21, −0.17]), likely due to cumulative effects on other processes such as feeding and growth. Among feeding habits, omnivores and deposit feeders were most negatively impacted (g = −0.93 [−1.69, −0.16] and −0.92 [−1.53, −0.31], respectively). The study incorporated the first meta-analysis to contrast the effects of leachates, virgin, aged and contaminated particles. Exposure to leachates had by far the strongest negative effects (g = −0.93 [−1.35, −0.51]), showing studies of contaminants and leachates are critical to future research. Overall, our meta-analysis reveals stronger and more consistent negative impacts of microplastics on seabed invertebrates than recorded for other marine biota. Seabed invertebrates are numerous and diverse, and crucial to bottom-up processes, including nutrient remineralisation, bentho-pelagic coupling and energy transfer through the ocean food web. Marine sediments will store microplastics over long timescales. The reveal that microplastics impinge on multiple fundamental biological processes of seabed fauna implies plastic pollution could have significant and enduring effects on the functioning of the ocean.

AB - Marine sediments are a sink for microplastics, making seabed organisms particularly exposed. We used meta-analysis to reveal general patterns in a surge in experimental studies and to test for microplastic impact on biological processes including invertebrate feeding, survival and energetics. Using Hedge's effect size (g), which assesses the mean response of organisms exposed to microplastics compared to control groups, we found negative impacts (significant negative g values) across all life stages (overall effect size (g) = −0.57 95 % CI [−0.76, −0.38]), with embryos most strongly affected (g = −1.47 [−2.21, −0.74]). Six of seven biological process rates were negatively impacted by microplastic exposure, including development, reproduction, growth and feeding. Survival strongly decreased (g = −0.69 [−1.21, −0.17]), likely due to cumulative effects on other processes such as feeding and growth. Among feeding habits, omnivores and deposit feeders were most negatively impacted (g = −0.93 [−1.69, −0.16] and −0.92 [−1.53, −0.31], respectively). The study incorporated the first meta-analysis to contrast the effects of leachates, virgin, aged and contaminated particles. Exposure to leachates had by far the strongest negative effects (g = −0.93 [−1.35, −0.51]), showing studies of contaminants and leachates are critical to future research. Overall, our meta-analysis reveals stronger and more consistent negative impacts of microplastics on seabed invertebrates than recorded for other marine biota. Seabed invertebrates are numerous and diverse, and crucial to bottom-up processes, including nutrient remineralisation, bentho-pelagic coupling and energy transfer through the ocean food web. Marine sediments will store microplastics over long timescales. The reveal that microplastics impinge on multiple fundamental biological processes of seabed fauna implies plastic pollution could have significant and enduring effects on the functioning of the ocean.

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157362

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157362

M3 - Article

VL - 845

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

M1 - 157362

ER -