Standard Standard

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial. / Williams, J. Mark G.; Crane, Catherine; Barnhofer, Thorsten et al.
In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 2, 02.12.2013, p. 275-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Williams, JMG, Crane, C, Barnhofer, T, Brennan, K, Duggan, D, Fennell, M, Hackmann, A, Krusche, A, Muse, K, Von Rohr, IR, Shah, D, Crane, R, Eames, C, Jones, M, Radford, S, Silverton, S, Sun, Y, Weatherley-Jones, E, Whitaker, C, Russell, D & Russell, I 2013, 'Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035036

APA

Williams, J. M. G., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Brennan, K., Duggan, D., Fennell, M., Hackmann, A., Krusche, A., Muse, K., Von Rohr, I. R., Shah, D., Crane, R., Eames, C., Jones, M., Radford, S., Silverton, S., Sun, Y., Weatherley-Jones, E., Whitaker, C., ... Russell, I. (2013). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035036

CBE

Williams JMG, Crane C, Barnhofer T, Brennan K, Duggan D, Fennell M, Hackmann A, Krusche A, Muse K, Von Rohr IR, et al. 2013. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 82(2):275-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035036

MLA

Williams, J. Mark G. et al. "Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2013, 82(2). 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035036

VancouverVancouver

Williams JMG, Crane C, Barnhofer T, Brennan K, Duggan D, Fennell M et al. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2013 Dec 2;82(2):275-286. doi: 10.1037/a0035036

Author

Williams, J. Mark G. ; Crane, Catherine ; Barnhofer, Thorsten et al. / Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression : A Randomized Dismantling Trial. In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 275-286.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression

T2 - A Randomized Dismantling Trial

AU - Williams, J. Mark G.

AU - Crane, Catherine

AU - Barnhofer, Thorsten

AU - Brennan, Kate

AU - Duggan, Danielle

AU - Fennell, Melanie

AU - Hackmann, Ann

AU - Krusche, Adele

AU - Muse, Kate

AU - Von Rohr, I.R.

AU - Shah, Dhruvi

AU - Crane, Rebecca

AU - Eames, Catrin

AU - Jones, Mariel

AU - Radford, Sholto

AU - Silverton, Sarah

AU - Sun, Yongzhong

AU - Weatherley-Jones, Elaine

AU - Whitaker, Christopher

AU - Russell, Daphne

AU - Russell, Ian

PY - 2013/12/2

Y1 - 2013/12/2

N2 - Objective: We compared mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with both cognitive psychological education (CPE) and treatment as usual (TAU) in preventing relapse to major depressive disorder (MDD) in people currently in remission following at least 3 previous episodes. Method: A randomized controlled trial in which 274 participants were allocated in the ratio 2:2:1 to MBCT plus TAU, CPE plus TAU, and TAU alone, and data were analyzed for the 255 (93%; MBCT = 99, CPE = 103, TAU = 53) retained to follow-up. MBCT was delivered in accordance with its published manual, modified to address suicidal cognitions; CPE was modeled on MBCT, but without training in meditation. Both treatments were delivered through 8 weekly classes. Results: Allocated treatment had no significant effect on risk of relapse to MDD over 12 months follow-up, hazard ratio for MBCT vs. CPE = 0.88, 95% CI [0.58, 1.35]; for MBCT vs. TAU = 0.69, 95% CI [0.42, 1.12]. However, severity of childhood trauma affected relapse, hazard ratio for increase of 1 standard deviation = 1.26 (95% CI [1.05, 1.50]), and significantly interacted with allocated treatment. Among participants above median severity, the hazard ratio was 0.61, 95% CI [0.34, 1.09], for MBCT vs. CPE, and 0.43, 95% CI [0.22, 0.87], for MBCT vs. TAU. For those below median severity, there were no such differences between treatment groups. Conclusion: MBCT provided significant protection against relapse for participants with increased vulnerability due to history of childhood trauma, but showed no significant advantage in comparison to an active control treatment and usual care over the whole group of patients with recurrent depression

AB - Objective: We compared mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with both cognitive psychological education (CPE) and treatment as usual (TAU) in preventing relapse to major depressive disorder (MDD) in people currently in remission following at least 3 previous episodes. Method: A randomized controlled trial in which 274 participants were allocated in the ratio 2:2:1 to MBCT plus TAU, CPE plus TAU, and TAU alone, and data were analyzed for the 255 (93%; MBCT = 99, CPE = 103, TAU = 53) retained to follow-up. MBCT was delivered in accordance with its published manual, modified to address suicidal cognitions; CPE was modeled on MBCT, but without training in meditation. Both treatments were delivered through 8 weekly classes. Results: Allocated treatment had no significant effect on risk of relapse to MDD over 12 months follow-up, hazard ratio for MBCT vs. CPE = 0.88, 95% CI [0.58, 1.35]; for MBCT vs. TAU = 0.69, 95% CI [0.42, 1.12]. However, severity of childhood trauma affected relapse, hazard ratio for increase of 1 standard deviation = 1.26 (95% CI [1.05, 1.50]), and significantly interacted with allocated treatment. Among participants above median severity, the hazard ratio was 0.61, 95% CI [0.34, 1.09], for MBCT vs. CPE, and 0.43, 95% CI [0.22, 0.87], for MBCT vs. TAU. For those below median severity, there were no such differences between treatment groups. Conclusion: MBCT provided significant protection against relapse for participants with increased vulnerability due to history of childhood trauma, but showed no significant advantage in comparison to an active control treatment and usual care over the whole group of patients with recurrent depression

U2 - 10.1037/a0035036

DO - 10.1037/a0035036

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 275

EP - 286

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 2

ER -