Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: NMR in biomedicine, Vol. 34, No. 5, e4484, 01.05.2021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS)
T2 - Experts' consensus recommendations
AU - Lin, Alexander
AU - Andronesi, Ovidiu
AU - Bogner, Wolfgang
AU - Choi, In-Young
AU - Coello, Eduardo
AU - Cudalbu, Cristina
AU - Juchem, Christoph
AU - Kemp, Graham J
AU - Kreis, Roland
AU - Krššák, Martin
AU - Lee, Phil
AU - Maudsley, Andrew A
AU - Meyerspeer, Martin
AU - Mlynarik, Vladamir
AU - Near, Jamie
AU - Öz, Gülin
AU - Peek, Aimie L
AU - Puts, Nicolaas A
AU - Ratai, Eva-Maria
AU - Tkáč, Ivan
AU - Mullins, Paul G
AU - Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy
N1 - © 2021 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post-processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta-analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full.
AB - The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post-processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta-analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full.
U2 - 10.1002/nbm.4484
DO - 10.1002/nbm.4484
M3 - Article
C2 - 33559967
VL - 34
JO - NMR in biomedicine
JF - NMR in biomedicine
SN - 0952-3480
IS - 5
M1 - e4484
ER -