Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. / Moore, Graham; Raisanen, Lawrence; Moore, Laurence et al.
In: Health Education, Vol. 113, No. 6, 2013, p. 476-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Moore, G, Raisanen, L, Moore, L, Din, N & Murphy, S 2013, 'Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme', Health Education, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 476-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

APA

Moore, G., Raisanen, L., Moore, L., Din, N., & Murphy, S. (2013). Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. Health Education, 113(6), 476-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

CBE

Moore G, Raisanen L, Moore L, Din N, Murphy S. 2013. Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. Health Education. 113(6):476-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Moore G, Raisanen L, Moore L, Din N, Murphy S. Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. Health Education. 2013;113(6):476-501. doi: 10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

Author

Moore, Graham ; Raisanen, Lawrence ; Moore, Laurence et al. / Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme. In: Health Education. 2013 ; Vol. 113, No. 6. pp. 476-501.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixed-method process evaluation of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme

AU - Moore, Graham

AU - Raisanen, Lawrence

AU - Moore, Laurence

AU - Din, Nafees

AU - Murphy, Simon

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose– Primary-care referral to community-based exercise specialists (exercise referral) is common in the UK despite limited evidence of effectiveness. A recent pragmatic randomised trial of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS), demonstrated promising impacts upon physical activity and mental health. This paper presents a mixed-method process evaluation exploring how outcomes were achieved.Design/methodology/approach– Structured observation, implementer interviews and routine data assessed the extent to which NERS was implemented as intended. Baseline trial data were combined with routine monitoring data for the purposes of profiling uptake and adherence. Semi-structured patient interviews explored processes of change and the emergence of social patterning in responses to the scheme.Findings– NERS offered patients a programme of supervised, group-based discounted exercise. However, motivational interviewing, goal-setting and patient follow-up protocols were delivered poorly. The high degree of professional support was perceived as helping patients to build confidence and assimilate into exercise environments. Patient-only classes provided social contacts, a supportive context and realistic models. Patterning in uptake emerged from access issues, with uptake lower among non-car owners. Adherence was poorer among mental health patients, younger patients and those who were least active prior to referral to NERS.Originality/value– In practice, although the NERS RCT demonstrated positive impacts on physical activity and mental health, process evaluation data indicate that the intervention was not entirely delivered as intended. Mixed-method process evaluation served crucial functions in understanding implementation and functioning, offering insights into the roles of professional support and exercise classes in promoting activity and mental health, and the emergence of social patterning in responses to an ERS.

AB - Purpose– Primary-care referral to community-based exercise specialists (exercise referral) is common in the UK despite limited evidence of effectiveness. A recent pragmatic randomised trial of the Welsh National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS), demonstrated promising impacts upon physical activity and mental health. This paper presents a mixed-method process evaluation exploring how outcomes were achieved.Design/methodology/approach– Structured observation, implementer interviews and routine data assessed the extent to which NERS was implemented as intended. Baseline trial data were combined with routine monitoring data for the purposes of profiling uptake and adherence. Semi-structured patient interviews explored processes of change and the emergence of social patterning in responses to the scheme.Findings– NERS offered patients a programme of supervised, group-based discounted exercise. However, motivational interviewing, goal-setting and patient follow-up protocols were delivered poorly. The high degree of professional support was perceived as helping patients to build confidence and assimilate into exercise environments. Patient-only classes provided social contacts, a supportive context and realistic models. Patterning in uptake emerged from access issues, with uptake lower among non-car owners. Adherence was poorer among mental health patients, younger patients and those who were least active prior to referral to NERS.Originality/value– In practice, although the NERS RCT demonstrated positive impacts on physical activity and mental health, process evaluation data indicate that the intervention was not entirely delivered as intended. Mixed-method process evaluation served crucial functions in understanding implementation and functioning, offering insights into the roles of professional support and exercise classes in promoting activity and mental health, and the emergence of social patterning in responses to an ERS.

KW - Evaluation, Behaviour change, Physical activity, Exercise, Process evaluation, Exercise referral, Complex interventions

U2 - 10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

DO - 10.1108/HE-08-2012-0046

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 476

EP - 501

JO - Health Education

JF - Health Education

SN - 0965-4283

IS - 6

ER -