Model Ensembles of Ecosystem Services Fill Global Certainty and Capacity Gaps
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Science Advances, Vol. 9, No. 14, 07.04.2023, p. eadf5492.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Model Ensembles of Ecosystem Services Fill Global Certainty and Capacity Gaps
AU - Willcock, Simon
AU - Hooftman, Danny
AU - Neugarten, Rachel
AU - Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
AU - Barredo, Jose
AU - Hickler, Thomas
AU - Kindermann, Georg
AU - Lewis, Amy
AU - Lindeskog, Mats
AU - Martinez-Lopez, Javier
AU - Bullock, James
PY - 2023/4/7
Y1 - 2023/4/7
N2 - Sustaining ecosystem services (ES) critical to human well-being is hindered by many practitioners lacking access to ES models ("the capacity gap") or knowledge of the accuracy of available models ("the certainty gap"), especially in the world's poorer regions. We developed ensembles of multiple models at an unprecedented global scale for five ES of high policy relevance. Ensembles were 2 to 14% more accurate than individual models. Ensemble accuracy was not correlated with proxies for research capacity, indicating that accuracy is distributed equitably across the globe and that countries less able to research ES suffer no accuracy penalty. By making these ES ensembles and associated accuracy estimates freely available, we provide globally consistent ES information that can support policy and decision-making in regions with low data availability or low capacity for implementing complex ES models. Thus, we hope to reduce the capacity and certainty gaps impeding local- to global-scale movement toward ES sustainability.
AB - Sustaining ecosystem services (ES) critical to human well-being is hindered by many practitioners lacking access to ES models ("the capacity gap") or knowledge of the accuracy of available models ("the certainty gap"), especially in the world's poorer regions. We developed ensembles of multiple models at an unprecedented global scale for five ES of high policy relevance. Ensembles were 2 to 14% more accurate than individual models. Ensemble accuracy was not correlated with proxies for research capacity, indicating that accuracy is distributed equitably across the globe and that countries less able to research ES suffer no accuracy penalty. By making these ES ensembles and associated accuracy estimates freely available, we provide globally consistent ES information that can support policy and decision-making in regions with low data availability or low capacity for implementing complex ES models. Thus, we hope to reduce the capacity and certainty gaps impeding local- to global-scale movement toward ES sustainability.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Ensemble
KW - Implementation gap
KW - Modelling
KW - Nature's contributions to people
KW - Uncertainty
U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.adf5492
DO - 10.1126/sciadv.adf5492
M3 - Article
C2 - 37027474
VL - 9
SP - eadf5492
JO - Science Advances
JF - Science Advances
SN - 2375-2548
IS - 14
ER -