Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, 20.12.2019.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport
AU - Hughes, Emma
AU - Dobbins, Tony
AU - Merkl-Davies, Doris
PY - 2019/12/20
Y1 - 2019/12/20
N2 - This article empirically applies Knut Laaser’s integrated conceptual framework, combining Sayer’s moral economy (ME) theory with labour process theory (LPT), to examine how two rival Irish unions engaged with an uneven moral economy and consciously sought to build collective worker solidarity during a dispute over competitive tendering and marketization. Using qualitative data from a case study of BusCo in Ireland’s public transport sector, the article enriches sociological understanding of trade union solidarity, and how it is engendered, contested and experienced.
AB - This article empirically applies Knut Laaser’s integrated conceptual framework, combining Sayer’s moral economy (ME) theory with labour process theory (LPT), to examine how two rival Irish unions engaged with an uneven moral economy and consciously sought to build collective worker solidarity during a dispute over competitive tendering and marketization. Using qualitative data from a case study of BusCo in Ireland’s public transport sector, the article enriches sociological understanding of trade union solidarity, and how it is engendered, contested and experienced.
KW - Labour process
KW - moral economy
KW - public transport
KW - solidarity
KW - unions
U2 - 10.1177/0143831X19891235
DO - 10.1177/0143831X19891235
M3 - Article
JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy
JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy
SN - 0143-831X
ER -