Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport. / Hughes, Emma; Dobbins, Tony; Merkl-Davies, Doris.
In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, 20.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Hughes, E, Dobbins, T & Merkl-Davies, D 2019, 'Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport', Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19891235

APA

Hughes, E., Dobbins, T., & Merkl-Davies, D. (2019). Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19891235

CBE

Hughes E, Dobbins T, Merkl-Davies D. 2019. Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19891235

MLA

Hughes, Emma, Tony Dobbins and Doris Merkl-Davies. "Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport". Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19891235

VancouverVancouver

Hughes E, Dobbins T, Merkl-Davies D. Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2019 Dec 20. Epub 2019 Dec 20. doi: 10.1177/0143831X19891235

Author

Hughes, Emma ; Dobbins, Tony ; Merkl-Davies, Doris. / Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2019.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral economy, solidarity and labour process struggle in Irish public transport

AU - Hughes, Emma

AU - Dobbins, Tony

AU - Merkl-Davies, Doris

PY - 2019/12/20

Y1 - 2019/12/20

N2 - This article empirically applies Knut Laaser’s integrated conceptual framework, combining Sayer’s moral economy (ME) theory with labour process theory (LPT), to examine how two rival Irish unions engaged with an uneven moral economy and consciously sought to build collective worker solidarity during a dispute over competitive tendering and marketization. Using qualitative data from a case study of BusCo in Ireland’s public transport sector, the article enriches sociological understanding of trade union solidarity, and how it is engendered, contested and experienced.

AB - This article empirically applies Knut Laaser’s integrated conceptual framework, combining Sayer’s moral economy (ME) theory with labour process theory (LPT), to examine how two rival Irish unions engaged with an uneven moral economy and consciously sought to build collective worker solidarity during a dispute over competitive tendering and marketization. Using qualitative data from a case study of BusCo in Ireland’s public transport sector, the article enriches sociological understanding of trade union solidarity, and how it is engendered, contested and experienced.

KW - Labour process

KW - moral economy

KW - public transport

KW - solidarity

KW - unions

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X19891235

DO - 10.1177/0143831X19891235

M3 - Article

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

ER -