Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • N. Richman
  • N.I. Richman
  • M. Bohm
  • S.B. Adams
  • F. Alvarez
  • E.A. Bergey
  • J.S. Bunn
  • Q. Burnham
  • J. Cordeiro
  • J. Coughran
  • K.A. Crandall
  • K.L. Dawkins
  • R.J. DiStefano
  • N.E. Doran
  • L. Edsman
  • A.G. Eversole
  • L. Fureder
  • J.M. Furse
  • F. Gherardi
  • P. Hamr
  • D.M. Holdich
  • P. Horwitz
  • K. Johnston
  • C.M. Jones
  • J.P. Jones
  • R.L. Jones
  • T.G. Jones
  • T. Kawai
  • S. Lawler
  • M. Lopez-Mejia
  • R.M. Miller
  • C. Padraza-Lara
  • J.D. Reynolds
  • A.M. Richardson
  • M.B. Schultz
  • G.A. Schuster
  • P.J. Sibley
  • C. Souty-Grosset
  • C.A. Taylor
  • R.F. Thoma
  • J. Walls
  • T.S. Walsh
  • B. Collen
Rates of biodiversity loss are higher in freshwater ecosystems than in most terrestrial or marine ecosystems, making freshwater conservation a priority. However, prioritization methods are impeded by insufficient knowledge on the distribution and conservation status of freshwater taxa, particularly invertebrates. We evaluated the extinction risk of the world's 590 freshwater crayfish species using the IUCN Categories and Criteria and found 32% of all species are threatened with extinction. The level of extinction risk differed between families, with proportionally more threatened species in the Parastacidae and Astacidae than in the Cambaridae. Four described species were Extinct and 21% were assessed as Data Deficient. There was geographical variation in the dominant threats affecting the main centres of crayfish diversity. The majority of threatened US and Mexican species face threats associated with urban development, pollution, damming and water management. Conversely, the majority of Australian threatened species are affected by climate change, harvesting, agriculture and invasive species. Only a small proportion of crayfish are found within the boundaries of protected areas, suggesting that alternative means of long-term protection will be required. Our study highlights many of the significant challenges yet to come for freshwater biodiversity unless conservation planning shifts from a reactive to proactive approach.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Volume370
Issue number1662
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2015

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations