Standard Standard

National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches. / Knight, Margaret E; Webster, Gordon; Perry, William B et al.
In: Water research, Vol. 262, 15.09.2024, p. 121989.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Knight, ME, Webster, G, Perry, WB, Baldwin, A, Rushton, L, Pass, DA, Cross, G, Durance, I, Muziasari, W, Kille, P, Farkas, K, Weightman, AJ & Jones, DL 2024, 'National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches', Water research, vol. 262, pp. 121989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

APA

Knight, M. E., Webster, G., Perry, W. B., Baldwin, A., Rushton, L., Pass, D. A., Cross, G., Durance, I., Muziasari, W., Kille, P., Farkas, K., Weightman, A. J., & Jones, D. L. (2024). National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches. Water research, 262, 121989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

CBE

Knight ME, Webster G, Perry WB, Baldwin A, Rushton L, Pass DA, Cross G, Durance I, Muziasari W, Kille P, et al. 2024. National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches. Water research. 262:121989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

MLA

VancouverVancouver

Knight ME, Webster G, Perry WB, Baldwin A, Rushton L, Pass DA et al. National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches. Water research. 2024 Sept 15;262:121989. Epub 2024 Jun 22. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater

T2 - A comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches

AU - Knight, Margaret E

AU - Webster, Gordon

AU - Perry, William B

AU - Baldwin, Amy

AU - Rushton, Laura

AU - Pass, Daniel A

AU - Cross, Gareth

AU - Durance, Isabelle

AU - Muziasari, Windi

AU - Kille, Peter

AU - Farkas, Kata

AU - Weightman, Andrew J

AU - Jones, Davey L

N1 - Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

PY - 2024/9/15

Y1 - 2024/9/15

N2 - Wastewater serves as an important reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and its surveillance can provide insights into population-level trends in AMR to inform public health policy. This study compared two common high-throughput screening approaches, namely (i) high-throughput quantitative PCR (HT qPCR), targeting 73 antimicrobial resistance genes, and (ii) metagenomic sequencing. Weekly composite samples of wastewater influent were taken from 47 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Wales, as part of a national AMR surveillance programme, alongside 4 weeks of daily wastewater effluent samples from a large municipal hospital. Metagenomic analysis provided more comprehensive resistome coverage, detecting 545 genes compared to the targeted 73 genes by HT qPCR. It further provided contextual information critical to risk assessment (i.e. potential bacterial hosts). In contrast, HT qPCR exhibited higher sensitivity, quantifying all targeted genes including those of clinical relevance present at low abundance. When limited to the HT qPCR target genes, both methods were able to reflect the spatiotemporal dynamics of the complete metagenomic resistome, distinguishing that of the hospital and the WWTPs. Both approaches revealed correlations between resistome compositional shifts and environmental variables like ammonium wastewater concentration, though differed in their interpretation of some potential influencing factors. Overall, metagenomics provides more comprehensive resistome profiling, while qPCR permits sensitive quantification of genes significant to clinical resistance. We highlight the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies aligned to surveillance aims to guide the development of effective wastewater-based AMR monitoring programmes.

AB - Wastewater serves as an important reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and its surveillance can provide insights into population-level trends in AMR to inform public health policy. This study compared two common high-throughput screening approaches, namely (i) high-throughput quantitative PCR (HT qPCR), targeting 73 antimicrobial resistance genes, and (ii) metagenomic sequencing. Weekly composite samples of wastewater influent were taken from 47 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Wales, as part of a national AMR surveillance programme, alongside 4 weeks of daily wastewater effluent samples from a large municipal hospital. Metagenomic analysis provided more comprehensive resistome coverage, detecting 545 genes compared to the targeted 73 genes by HT qPCR. It further provided contextual information critical to risk assessment (i.e. potential bacterial hosts). In contrast, HT qPCR exhibited higher sensitivity, quantifying all targeted genes including those of clinical relevance present at low abundance. When limited to the HT qPCR target genes, both methods were able to reflect the spatiotemporal dynamics of the complete metagenomic resistome, distinguishing that of the hospital and the WWTPs. Both approaches revealed correlations between resistome compositional shifts and environmental variables like ammonium wastewater concentration, though differed in their interpretation of some potential influencing factors. Overall, metagenomics provides more comprehensive resistome profiling, while qPCR permits sensitive quantification of genes significant to clinical resistance. We highlight the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies aligned to surveillance aims to guide the development of effective wastewater-based AMR monitoring programmes.

KW - Wastewater/microbiology

KW - Metagenomics/methods

KW - Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics

KW - Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

KW - Environmental Monitoring/methods

KW - Bacteria/genetics

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121989

M3 - Article

C2 - 39018584

VL - 262

SP - 121989

JO - Water research

JF - Water research

SN - 0043-1354

ER -