Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard Standard

Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC. / Hyland, Mark; Perry, Thomas.
In: European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 41, No. 12, 01.12.2019, p. 778-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

HarvardHarvard

Hyland, M & Perry, T 2019, 'Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC', European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 778-780.

APA

Hyland, M., & Perry, T. (2019). Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC. European Intellectual Property Review, 41(12), 778-780.

CBE

Hyland M, Perry T. 2019. Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC. European Intellectual Property Review. 41(12):778-780.

MLA

Hyland, Mark and Thomas Perry. "Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC". European Intellectual Property Review. 2019, 41(12). 778-780.

VancouverVancouver

Hyland M, Perry T. Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC. European Intellectual Property Review. 2019 Dec 1;41(12):778-780.

Author

Hyland, Mark ; Perry, Thomas. / Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC. In: European Intellectual Property Review. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 12. pp. 778-780.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not so happy campers: Happy Camper Productions Ltd v BBC

AU - Hyland, Mark

AU - Perry, Thomas

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The recent judgment in Happy Camper Productions Ltd v British Broadcasting Corporation illustrates the difficulties in obtaining an interim injunction where there is an allegation of alleged copyright infringement. As the judge explained, in such situations, there are three questions that need to be considered. The first is whether there is a serious question to be tried. Secondly, if there is, would damages be an adequate remedy? And thirdly, what would the balance of convenience be?

AB - The recent judgment in Happy Camper Productions Ltd v British Broadcasting Corporation illustrates the difficulties in obtaining an interim injunction where there is an allegation of alleged copyright infringement. As the judge explained, in such situations, there are three questions that need to be considered. The first is whether there is a serious question to be tried. Secondly, if there is, would damages be an adequate remedy? And thirdly, what would the balance of convenience be?

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 778

EP - 780

JO - European Intellectual Property Review

JF - European Intellectual Property Review

SN - 0142-0461

IS - 12

ER -