Novel genetic sex markers reveal unexpected lack of, and similar susceptibility to, sex reversal in free-living common toads in both natural and anthropogenic habitats
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Molecular Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 7, 04.2022, p. 2032-2043.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel genetic sex markers reveal unexpected lack of, and similar susceptibility to, sex reversal in free-living common toads in both natural and anthropogenic habitats
AU - Nemesházi, Edina
AU - Sramkó, Gábor
AU - Laczkó, Levente
AU - Balogh, Emese
AU - Szatmári, Lajos
AU - Vili, Nóra
AU - Ujhegyi, Nikolett
AU - Üveges, Bálint
AU - Bókony, Veronika
N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Anthropogenic environmental changes are affecting biodiversity and microevolution worldwide. Ectothermic vertebrates are especially vulnerable because environmental changes can disrupt their sexual development and cause sex reversal, a mismatch between genetic and phenotypic sex. This can potentially lead to sex-ratio distortion and population decline. Despite these implications, there is scarce empirical knowledge on the incidence of sex reversal in nature. Populations in anthropogenic environments may be exposed to sex-reversing stimuli more frequently, which may lead to higher sex-reversal rate or, alternatively, these populations may adapt to resist sex reversal. We developed PCR-based genetic sex markers for the common toad (Bufo bufo) to assess the prevalence of sex reversal in wild populations living in natural, agricultural and urban habitats, and the susceptibility of the same populations to two ubiquitous oestrogenic pollutants in a common garden experiment. We found negligible sex-reversal frequency in free-living adults despite the presence of various endocrine-disrupting pollutants in their breeding ponds. Individuals from different habitat types showed similar susceptibility to sex reversal in the laboratory: all genetic males developed female phenotype when exposed to 1 µg L -1 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) during larval development, whereas no sex reversal occurred in response to 1 ng L -1 EE2 and a glyphosate-based herbicide with 3 µg L -1 or 3 mg L -1 glyphosate. The latter results do not support that populations in anthropogenic habitats would have either increased propensity for or higher tolerance to chemically induced sex reversal. Thus, the extremely low sex-reversal frequency in wild toads compared to other ectothermic vertebrates studied before might indicate idiosyncratic, potentially species-specific resistance to sex reversal.
AB - Anthropogenic environmental changes are affecting biodiversity and microevolution worldwide. Ectothermic vertebrates are especially vulnerable because environmental changes can disrupt their sexual development and cause sex reversal, a mismatch between genetic and phenotypic sex. This can potentially lead to sex-ratio distortion and population decline. Despite these implications, there is scarce empirical knowledge on the incidence of sex reversal in nature. Populations in anthropogenic environments may be exposed to sex-reversing stimuli more frequently, which may lead to higher sex-reversal rate or, alternatively, these populations may adapt to resist sex reversal. We developed PCR-based genetic sex markers for the common toad (Bufo bufo) to assess the prevalence of sex reversal in wild populations living in natural, agricultural and urban habitats, and the susceptibility of the same populations to two ubiquitous oestrogenic pollutants in a common garden experiment. We found negligible sex-reversal frequency in free-living adults despite the presence of various endocrine-disrupting pollutants in their breeding ponds. Individuals from different habitat types showed similar susceptibility to sex reversal in the laboratory: all genetic males developed female phenotype when exposed to 1 µg L -1 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) during larval development, whereas no sex reversal occurred in response to 1 ng L -1 EE2 and a glyphosate-based herbicide with 3 µg L -1 or 3 mg L -1 glyphosate. The latter results do not support that populations in anthropogenic habitats would have either increased propensity for or higher tolerance to chemically induced sex reversal. Thus, the extremely low sex-reversal frequency in wild toads compared to other ectothermic vertebrates studied before might indicate idiosyncratic, potentially species-specific resistance to sex reversal.
KW - amphibians
KW - feminization
KW - human-induced environmental change
KW - molecular sex markers
KW - sex change
KW - sex-chromosome identification
U2 - 10.1111/mec.16388
DO - 10.1111/mec.16388
M3 - Article
C2 - 35146823
VL - 31
SP - 2032
EP - 2043
JO - Molecular Ecology
JF - Molecular Ecology
SN - 0962-1083
IS - 7
ER -