Now and then: Hand choice is influenced by recent action history
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 305-314.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Now and then
T2 - Hand choice is influenced by recent action history
AU - Valyear, Kenneth F.
AU - Fitzpatrick, Aoife M.
AU - Dundon, Neil M.
N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/[10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1]
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Action choices are influenced by recent past and predicted future action states. Here we demonstrate that recent hand choice history affects both current hand choices and response times to initiate actions. Participants reach to contact visible targets using one hand. Hand choice is biased in favour of which hand was used recently, in particular when the biomechanical costs of responding with either hand are similar, and repeated choices lead to reduced response times. These effects are also found to positively correlate. Participants who show strong effects of recent history on hand choice also tend to show strong effects of recent history on response times. The data are consistent with a computational efficiency interpretation whereby repeated action choices confer computational gains in the efficiency of underpinning processes. We discuss our results within the framework of this model, and with respect to balancing predicted gains and losses, and speculate about the possible underlying mechanisms in neural terms.
AB - Action choices are influenced by recent past and predicted future action states. Here we demonstrate that recent hand choice history affects both current hand choices and response times to initiate actions. Participants reach to contact visible targets using one hand. Hand choice is biased in favour of which hand was used recently, in particular when the biomechanical costs of responding with either hand are similar, and repeated choices lead to reduced response times. These effects are also found to positively correlate. Participants who show strong effects of recent history on hand choice also tend to show strong effects of recent history on response times. The data are consistent with a computational efficiency interpretation whereby repeated action choices confer computational gains in the efficiency of underpinning processes. We discuss our results within the framework of this model, and with respect to balancing predicted gains and losses, and speculate about the possible underlying mechanisms in neural terms.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Biomechanical Phenomena
KW - Choice Behavior
KW - Female
KW - Functional Laterality/physiology
KW - Hand/physiology
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Psychomotor Performance/physiology
KW - Reaction Time
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1
DO - 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 305
EP - 314
JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
SN - 1069-9384
IS - 1
ER -