Optimizing internal wave drag in a forward barotropic model with semidiurnal tides
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Ocean Modelling, Vol. 85, 22.11.2014, p. 42-55.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing internal wave drag in a forward barotropic model with semidiurnal tides
AU - Buijsman, M.C.
AU - Arbic, B.K.
AU - Green, J.A.
AU - Helber, R.W.
AU - Richman, J.G.
AU - Shriver, J.F.
AU - Timko, P.G.
AU - Wallcraft, A.
N1 - Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); (Grant NE/F014821/1)
PY - 2014/11/22
Y1 - 2014/11/22
N2 - A global tuning experiment for the semidiurnal tide is performed with a barotropic model. The model is forced with the M-2 equilibrium tide and accounts for the self-attraction and loading (SAL) term. In addition to a quadratic drag, various linear internal wave drag terms adjusted by a scale factor of O(1) are applied. The drag terms include the original Nycander (2005) tensor scheme, the Nycander tensor scheme reduced at supercritical slopes, and their scalar sisters, a Nycander scalar scheme computed for additional abyssal hill roughness, and the Jayne and St. Laurent (2001) scalar scheme. The Nycander scheme does not have a tunable parameter, but to obtain the best tidal solutions, it is demonstrated that some tuning is unavoidable. It is shown that the scalar Nycander schemes yield slightly lower root-mean square (RMS) elevation errors vs. the data-assimilative TPXO tide model than the tensor schemes. Although the simulation with the optimally tuned original Nycander scalar yields dissipation rates close to TPXO, the RMS error is among the highest. The RMS error is lowered for the reduced schemes, which place relatively more dissipation in deeper water. The inclusion of abyssal hill roughness improves the regional agreement with TPXO dissipation rates, without changing the RMS errors. It is difficult to have each ocean basin optimally tuned with the application of a constant scale factor. The relatively high RMS error in the Atlantic Ocean is reduced with a spatially varying scale factor with a larger value in the Atlantic. Our best global mean RMS error of 4.4 cm for areas deeper than 1000 m and equatorward of 66 degrees is among the lowest obtained in a forward barotropic tide model
AB - A global tuning experiment for the semidiurnal tide is performed with a barotropic model. The model is forced with the M-2 equilibrium tide and accounts for the self-attraction and loading (SAL) term. In addition to a quadratic drag, various linear internal wave drag terms adjusted by a scale factor of O(1) are applied. The drag terms include the original Nycander (2005) tensor scheme, the Nycander tensor scheme reduced at supercritical slopes, and their scalar sisters, a Nycander scalar scheme computed for additional abyssal hill roughness, and the Jayne and St. Laurent (2001) scalar scheme. The Nycander scheme does not have a tunable parameter, but to obtain the best tidal solutions, it is demonstrated that some tuning is unavoidable. It is shown that the scalar Nycander schemes yield slightly lower root-mean square (RMS) elevation errors vs. the data-assimilative TPXO tide model than the tensor schemes. Although the simulation with the optimally tuned original Nycander scalar yields dissipation rates close to TPXO, the RMS error is among the highest. The RMS error is lowered for the reduced schemes, which place relatively more dissipation in deeper water. The inclusion of abyssal hill roughness improves the regional agreement with TPXO dissipation rates, without changing the RMS errors. It is difficult to have each ocean basin optimally tuned with the application of a constant scale factor. The relatively high RMS error in the Atlantic Ocean is reduced with a spatially varying scale factor with a larger value in the Atlantic. Our best global mean RMS error of 4.4 cm for areas deeper than 1000 m and equatorward of 66 degrees is among the lowest obtained in a forward barotropic tide model
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.11.003
M3 - Article
VL - 85
SP - 42
EP - 55
JO - Ocean Modelling
JF - Ocean Modelling
SN - 1463-5003
ER -