Patient assessment in general dental practice - risk assessment or clinical monitoring?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: British Dental Journal, Vol. 210, No. 8, 23.04.2011, p. 351-4.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient assessment in general dental practice - risk assessment or clinical monitoring?
AU - Brocklehurst, P. R.
AU - Ashley, J. R.
AU - Tickle, M
PY - 2011/4/23
Y1 - 2011/4/23
N2 - Risk assessment in general dental practice is becoming increasingly common and has led to the development of care protocols, which aim to act as a framework for decision making to produce an optimum level of care. However, many models of risk have been informed by research undertaken in academia and are based upon summary statistics of populations. In practice, a significant proportion of patients attend on a non-symptomatic, continuous and regular basis, often over long periods of time. This provides general dental practitioners with a wealth of knowledge about their patients to inform clinical decision making on an individual basis. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the important differences between an academic assessment of risk and one that is relevant to practice, before introducing a simple tool to screen out patients who are considered to be 'low risk'. The relevance of this tool is discussed, along with its potential uses and limitations as a means to promote discussion during the development of the pilots for the new dental contract to be introduced by the coalition government.
AB - Risk assessment in general dental practice is becoming increasingly common and has led to the development of care protocols, which aim to act as a framework for decision making to produce an optimum level of care. However, many models of risk have been informed by research undertaken in academia and are based upon summary statistics of populations. In practice, a significant proportion of patients attend on a non-symptomatic, continuous and regular basis, often over long periods of time. This provides general dental practitioners with a wealth of knowledge about their patients to inform clinical decision making on an individual basis. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the important differences between an academic assessment of risk and one that is relevant to practice, before introducing a simple tool to screen out patients who are considered to be 'low risk'. The relevance of this tool is discussed, along with its potential uses and limitations as a means to promote discussion during the development of the pilots for the new dental contract to be introduced by the coalition government.
KW - Adult
KW - Child
KW - Continuity of Patient Care
KW - Decision Making
KW - Dental Care
KW - Dental Caries
KW - Dental Research
KW - Dentist-Patient Relations
KW - Evidence-Based Dentistry
KW - Forecasting
KW - General Practice, Dental
KW - Health Status
KW - Humans
KW - Mass Screening
KW - Needs Assessment
KW - Oral Health
KW - Patient Care Planning
KW - Periodontal Diseases
KW - Primary Health Care
KW - Research Design
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.284
DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.284
M3 - Article
C2 - 21509009
VL - 210
SP - 351
EP - 354
JO - British Dental Journal
JF - British Dental Journal
SN - 1476-5373
IS - 8
ER -