Electronic versions

Documents

DOI

  • Xinxue Liu
  • Alasdair P. S. Munro
  • Shuo Feng
  • Leila Janani
  • Parvinder K. Aley
  • Gavin Babbage
  • David Baxter
  • Marcin Bula
  • Katrina Cathie
  • Krishna Chatterjee
  • Wanwisa Dejnirattisai
  • Kate Dodd
  • Yvanne Enever
  • Ehsaan Qureshi
  • Anna L. Goodman
  • Linda Harndahl
  • John Haughney
  • Alexander Hicks
  • Agatha A. van der Klaauw
  • Jonathan Kwok
  • Vincenzo Libri
  • Martin J. Llewelyn
  • Alastair C. McGregor
  • Angela M. Minassian
  • Patrick Moore
  • Mehmood Mughal
  • Yama F. Mujadidi
  • Kyra Holliday
  • Orod Osanlou
  • Rostam Osanlou
  • Daniel R. Owens
  • Mihaela Pacurar
  • Adrian Palfreeman
  • Daniel Pan
  • Tommy Rampling
  • Karen Regan
  • Stephen Saich
  • Teona Serafimova
  • Dinesh Saralaya
  • Gavin R. Screaton
  • Sunil Sharma
  • Ray Sheridan
  • Ann Sturdy
  • Piyada Supasa
  • Emma C. Thomson
  • Shirley Todd
  • Chris Twelves
  • Robert C. Read
  • Sue Charlton
  • Bassam Hallis
  • Mary Ramsay
  • Nick Andrews
  • Teresa Lambe
  • Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam
  • Victoria Cornelius
  • Matthew D. Snape
  • Saul N. Faust

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the persistence of immunogenicity three months after third dose boosters.

METHODS: COV-BOOST is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial of seven COVID-19 vaccines used as a third booster dose. The analysis was conducted using all randomised participants who were SARS-CoV-2 naïve during the study.

RESULTS: Amongst the 2883 participants randomised, there were 2422 SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants until D84 visit included in the analysis with median age of 70 (IQR: 30-94) years. In the participants who had two initial doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd), schedules using mRNA vaccines as third dose have the highest anti-spike IgG at D84 (e.g. geometric mean concentration of 8674 ELU/ml (95% CI: 7461-10,085) following ChAd/ChAd/BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNtech, hearafter referred to as BNT)). However, in people who had two initial doses of BNT there was no significant difference at D84 in people given ChAd versus BNT (geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 0.95 (95%CI: 0.78, 1.15). Also, people given Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; hereafter referred to as Ad26) as a third dose had significantly higher anti-spike IgG at D84 than BNT (GMR of 1.20, 95%CI: 1.01,1.43). Responses at D84 between people who received BNT (15 μg) or BNT (30 μg) after ChAd/ChAd or BNT/BNT were similar, with anti-spike IgG GMRs of half-BNT (15 μg) versus BNT (30 μg) ranging between 0.74-0.86. The decay rate of cellular responses were similar between all the vaccine schedules and doses.

CONCLUSIONS: 84 days after a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine the decay rates of humoral response were different between vaccines. Adenoviral vector vaccine anti-spike IgG concentrations at D84 following BNT/BNT initial doses were similar to or even higher than for a three dose (BNT/BNT/BNT) schedule. Half dose BNT immune responses were similar to full dose responses. While high antibody tires are desirable in situations of high transmission of new variants of concern, the maintenance of immune responses that confer long-lasting protection against severe disease or death is also of critical importance. Policymakers may also consider adenoviral vector, fractional dose of mRNA, or other non-mRNA vaccines as third doses.

Keywords

  • COVID-19 vaccine, Third dose, Heterologous boost, Homologous boost, Fractional dose, Immunogenicity, Persistence
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)795-813
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume84
Issue number6
Early online date9 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Total downloads

No data available
View graph of relations