Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention? / Sambrook, S.A.; Bradbury-Jones, C.; Irvine, F. et al.
In: Nurse Researcher, Vol. 17, No. 2, 20.01.2010, p. 25-33.
In: Nurse Researcher, Vol. 17, No. 2, 20.01.2010, p. 25-33.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
Sambrook, SA, Bradbury-Jones, C, Irvine, F & Sambrook, S 2010, 'Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?', Nurse Researcher, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 25-33.
APA
Sambrook, S. A., Bradbury-Jones, C., Irvine, F., & Sambrook, S. (2010). Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention? Nurse Researcher, 17(2), 25-33.
CBE
Sambrook SA, Bradbury-Jones C, Irvine F, Sambrook S. 2010. Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?. Nurse Researcher. 17(2):25-33.
MLA
Sambrook, S.A. et al. "Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?". Nurse Researcher. 2010, 17(2). 25-33.
VancouverVancouver
Sambrook SA, Bradbury-Jones C, Irvine F, Sambrook S. Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention? Nurse Researcher. 2010 Jan 20;17(2):25-33.
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Phenomenology and participant feedback: convention or contention?
AU - Sambrook, S.A.
AU - Bradbury-Jones, C.
AU - Irvine, F.
AU - Sambrook, S.
PY - 2010/1/20
Y1 - 2010/1/20
M3 - Article
VL - 17
SP - 25
EP - 33
JO - Nurse Researcher
JF - Nurse Researcher
SN - 1351-5578
IS - 2
ER -