Political-intelligence elites, Strategic Political Communication and the press: the need for, and utility of, a benchmark of public accountability demands
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Standard Standard
In: Intelligence and National Security, 16.09.2016, p. 1-22.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
HarvardHarvard
APA
CBE
MLA
VancouverVancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Political-intelligence elites, Strategic Political Communication and the press:
T2 - the need for, and utility of, a benchmark of public accountability demands
AU - Bakir, Vian
PY - 2016/9/16
Y1 - 2016/9/16
N2 - This article explores whether the contemporary press adequately holds political-intelligence elites accountable when facing Strategic Political Communication (SPC) during those long periods when whistle-blowers are absent (‘journalism-as-usual’). It develops an original benchmark of public accountability demands of political-intelligence elites that the press should be capable of making, thereby providing concrete discursive strategies to facilitate this difficult task. Demonstrating its utility, this benchmark is used to evaluate press oversight during journalism-as-usual and facing Obama administration political-intelligence elite SPC on the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. This shows that manipulation of the contemporary press occurs through subtle, but effective, SPC techniques involving a certain style of information provision that influences national, international, mainstream and alternative press outlets’ accountability demands.
AB - This article explores whether the contemporary press adequately holds political-intelligence elites accountable when facing Strategic Political Communication (SPC) during those long periods when whistle-blowers are absent (‘journalism-as-usual’). It develops an original benchmark of public accountability demands of political-intelligence elites that the press should be capable of making, thereby providing concrete discursive strategies to facilitate this difficult task. Demonstrating its utility, this benchmark is used to evaluate press oversight during journalism-as-usual and facing Obama administration political-intelligence elite SPC on the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. This shows that manipulation of the contemporary press occurs through subtle, but effective, SPC techniques involving a certain style of information provision that influences national, international, mainstream and alternative press outlets’ accountability demands.
KW - accountability
KW - press
KW - political-intelligence elite
KW - strategic political communication
KW - torture, detention and interrogation program
U2 - 10.1080/02684527.2016.1231866
DO - 10.1080/02684527.2016.1231866
M3 - Article
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Intelligence and National Security
JF - Intelligence and National Security
SN - 1743-9019
ER -